yvpil057's profile page

Profile picture

yvpil057 (user #1,897) Gold MedalSilver TrophySuper StarDiamond

Joined on December 14th, 2011 (2,561 days ago)

Last login was over 3 months ago

Votes: 1,842

Questions: 26 view

Comments: 1,045

Profile views: 26



Yvpil057 has submitted the following questions: voting view

66%
34
What is worse? A woman getting raped by a man? or A man getting raped by a woman? 6 years ago 355 votes 26 comments 0 likes
40%
60%
Would you rather find out that the razor you shave with was used daily to... shave your dad's genital hair? or shave your Mom's genital hair? 6 years ago 131,224 votes 361 comments 3 likes
74%
26
Would you rather live on (with about 10,000 other humans) A planet in another solar system that can support life? or A fully self-sufficient space ship floating in deep space? 6 years ago 384 votes 11 comments 0 likes
33
67%
Would you rather give up Fruit? or Veggies? 6 years ago 389 votes 10 comments 0 likes
69%
31
Do you believe in Free Will? or Destiny? 6 years ago 344 votes 8 comments 0 likes
21
79%
Would you rather Go back in time to when you were born, but keep all of the knowledge you have right now? or Receive $1,000,000,000,000 (One Trillion Dollars)? 6 years ago 430 votes 18 comments 0 likes
26
74%
Would you rather have a (both would be generally considered unattractive) disporportionate face? or disproportionate body? (sorry, couldn't find a better image) 6 years ago 286 votes 11 comments 0 likes
90%
Which would you rather happen? (Your choice prevents the other choice from happening) God himself tells you that Adolf Hitler went permanently to Heaven? or You suffer in hell for eternity? 6 years ago 760 votes 25 comments 0 likes
78%
22
Would you rather have sexual education Taught at schools? or Not taught at schools? 6 years ago 4,105 votes 37 comments 0 likes
66%
34
Is Therapeutic Healing real or a hoax? Real or Hoax 6 years ago 287 votes 2 comments 0 likes
66%
34
Would you rather Increase the legal smoking age to 25? or Increase the legal drinking age of beverages with over 15% alcohol content to 25? 6 years ago 636 votes 18 comments 0 likes
64%
36
Do you think Physician Assisted Suicide is... A natural human right to a good, painless death which should be made legal? or A sin, a form of suicide which should be made illegal? 6 years ago 302 votes 5 comments 0 likes
86%
Would you rather Provide everyone in the world with effective birth control? (They're NOT forced to use it) or Make birth control illegal and make having sex for pleasure illegal? 6 years ago 4,244 votes 22 comments 0 likes
70%
30
Would you rather Keep abortion legal, but give it a limit (1 per year for example) to prevent its use as birth control? or Make Abortions permanently illegal, even if having teh child will kill the mother? 6 years ago 2,373 votes 33 comments 0 likes
64%
36
Would you rather press a button which would... End world hunger permanently and kill every mentally challenged person alive and all born after? or Cure all currently mentally challenged (making them normal) and kill all of the starving people alive right now? 6 years ago 1,582 votes 22 comments 0 likes
28
72%
Would you rather be infected with AIDS and be permanently unaffected by every other disease/virus/illness that has or will exist? or Get 25 random illnesses every year, none of which are fatal. 6 years ago 369 votes 19 comments 0 likes
35
65%
Would you rather make circumcision manditory for all boys AND girls? or make it illegal for all boys AND girls? 6 years ago 744 votes 31 comments 0 likes
73%
27
Who would win in a fight? Torpedo cat? or Poorly photoshopped CentiPug? 6 years ago 929 votes 10 comments 0 likes
57%
43%
When it comes to business meetings starting late, are you Patient and calm? or Impatient and irritated? 6 years ago 370 votes 10 comments 0 likes
76%
24
How do you give yourself a profile picture? A large image? (Mine shows "can't show image") or A small image? (Mine shows "can't show image") 6 years ago 314 votes 3 comments 0 likes
45%
55%
Are you dumb? A? or B? 7 years ago 394 votes 19 comments 0 likes
74%
26
Would you rather Sodomize Phelps' ass? (he's the leader of Westboro) or raise your children with the ideals of Westboro? 7 years ago 783 votes 14 comments 0 likes
23
77%
Would you rather resemble A hippo or A walrus 7 years ago 430 votes 8 comments 0 likes
81%
Which would you rather have sex with if they switched bodies but not minds/personalities? Mom (with the mind of girlfriend) or Girlfriend (with the mind of Mom) 7 years ago 12,336 votes 86 comments 0 likes
72%
28
Would you rather Learn the truth about religion, risking the possibility that it's all a lie? (Or that the true religion is not yours) or not learn the truth and continue believing what you believe? 7 years ago 1,616 votes 35 comments 0 likes
20
80%
Would you rather get rid of (while keeping the other) all the child pornography in the world or All of the pedophiles in the world 7 years ago 652 votes 21 comments 0 likes

Yvpil057 has posted the following comments:

If God was always there, then why did he not "create everything" before? 6 years ago  
So then why did you vote for the big bang? 6 years ago +2
So then why did you vote for the big bang? 6 years ago +2
Oh, okay, so you want to hunt down hundreds of people and torture them, but THEY'RE the heartless evil idiots. Your lack of awareness that you are a hypocrit is only surpassed by your lack of intelligence. 6 years ago +1
I believe that God exists, but I also believe that this universe was created by the Big Bang, or at least something like it, since I highly doubt that modern physicist actually have an accurate grasp on the matter given our excessively primitive knowledge in this field. It may take thousands of years before we discover the truth and find evidence to make it a theory. For all we know, the Big Bang is only 5% correct as researchers know today. 6 years ago +1
No, seriously, your kind is not worthy of being called believers in God. As a very intelligent and tolerant person said 18 pages back from this comment: "Wow! Some of the comments from Christians on here! Guys! Stop calling the Athiests dumb. Christ came to save them too. It's not their fault they're blinded and haven't seen the ... truth. That's Biblical! 2 Corinthians 4:4 - "Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don't understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God." We're not supposed to judge outside the church. Sure, it's frustrating trying to tell someone who's blind what light is, but you're not supposed to yell at them and insult them, we're supposed to be showing them God's love." 6 years ago +1
lol... you don't deserve to believe in god. 6 years ago  
Guys, visit pages 5-20 and you will see some very interesting, heated discussions between me (yvpil057) who acknowledges the Big Bang and another person (Random1234) who believes that God did it. 6 years ago +1
It wasn't an explosion. 6 years ago  
Obama. 6 years ago  
The new outlook on the website is bad imo. 6 years ago +1
Oh, so the tribal people who are isolated from the world, such as the African Bushmen, who have absolutely no access to a Bible or someone to tell them of God are doomed to go to hell? And God would allow them to exist in such a place with no way to learn of him? Great logic. 6 years ago +2
Infinity does not exist. 6 years ago +2
lol... some religious person you are... ever heard of "forgiving your enemy?" 6 years ago +2
God is a theory. 6 years ago  
Sure you can. You can easily use an anal vibe or force him to watch a porno. 6 years ago  
Where does it say in the guests comment that he believes in what the Bible says? 6 years ago  
No I'm pretty sure it's been going on only for a few hundred years, as Charles Darwin's evidence of evolution only became widely knowin in the 1800s. 6 years ago  
And yet according to the Bible, God created mass out of nothing. 6 years ago +1
extremely light :P 1/1000 of a miligram per year for example. 6 years ago +446
Unfortunately those people do not know the theory as well as the think :( 6 years ago  
But a theory is just a scientific term for a widely-accepted hypothesis. Just as the "Law of Gravity" is actually called the "Theory of Gravity." 6 years ago  
No. We are all wrong. That includes you as well. 6 years ago  
We clearly observe the results of the Big Bang every day. The expantion of our universe as measured through the positioning and changing of position of the stars and the nearby galaxies. 6 years ago  
Mass can be both created and destroyed. Scientists have evidence for this now. 6 years ago  
How many times to I have to reply to you? The hyper-condensed Big Bang matter ALWAYS EXISTED. IT DID NOT EXPLODE OUT OF NOWHERE! Do you get it yet? 6 years ago  
You're ignorant of the Big Bang theory. It does not say that something popped out of nowhere and there was no explosion. 6 years ago +1
Also, you're an idiot for thinking that the Big Bang was an explosion. It was expanding matter, not an explosion. The name is slightly misleading but that's to weed out those like you who know nothing of the theory. 6 years ago +2
Actually, we are. Or so I believe, as well as the many others who believe in Brahman. 6 years ago +1
Now allow me to make a few points against Random1234. First off, you said that matter cannot be created. This is false. Matter indeed can be created and scientists are currently researching this aspect of matter. Theorists are putting forth that Matter is essencially energy. There is a direct relationship between matter and energy. Energy can be converted directly into matter and matter directly into energy. Secondly, you mentioned that matter cannot be destroyed. This is also false, as researchers are gaining more insight into dark matter and anti-matter. According to them, when anti-matter collides with matter, the two substances are destroyed forever. They are eliminated. Obliterated. Erased from existence. There is alot of modern research going on, and its difficult to keep up with it since its being discovered and researched so swiftly in this modern age. 6 years ago +2
I think I've finally decided what I shall believe. God IS the Big Bang. The Big Bang is God. Allow me to make my points. 1. From here on, when I say Big Bang, I'm referring to the initial super-condensed mass, and not the event. 2. The Big Bang always existed. Just like God is assumed to always have existed. 3. The Big Bang created light first, then the sun/stars were formed later. Just like the biblical texts. 4. If the Big Bang IS God, then it is true that God is omnipresent. Everything is God. We are all God, but divided, hence we do not have immortality/other things said about God. 5. If The Big Bang is God, then Indeed, God is all powerful. Since The Big Bang is all matter currently in existence within our universe, then all of the possible power that can exist is within those boundaries, hence all power is within God. All power is within all of the matter of the universe. 6. If God is the Big Bang, then indeed God is all-wise. All of the knowledge and information that exist is part of the physical world, hence it is God, hence the Big Bang is all-knowing. God is eternal, The Big Bang is eternal. All matter which currently exists shall exist for eons to come. 7. If what I say is correct, then there is purpose behind us praying to God. We are not praying to God, but instead are praying to ourselves, since we are God. By doing this, we fill ourselves with hope, confidence, and the will to go on in life. It is not God that helps us, but us that help ourselves. Whew that was a long text. 6 years ago +1
Please allow me to elaborate on my previous replies/posts. First off, the Big Bang doesn't state that "something exploded out of nothing." Instead, the Big Bang theory states that all matter was hypercondensed and then began rapidly expanding. It was never "popping up out of nothing" as you say. Secondly, just as you say that God could have always existed, why not this hypercondensed mass? It too could have always existed. Yes in fact it could have always existed. I'll answer your last question with another question. WHy did it not explode any time before? Why at the moment it did? Well... Why did God decide to create everything when he did? Why not before? Why at the moment he did? So there is your response. Hey, for all we know, that hypercondensed mass could have been sentient. It could very well have been God. I'm getting a heavy influx of brainstorming now and will type up my thoughts in an above comment. 6 years ago  
Nice. Gave me a good chuckle. 6 years ago  
You must have had very little faith to begin with :P 6 years ago  
The Big Bang was always there. 6 years ago  
Spell check... 6 years ago  
Well... if you believe that God created everything, then you believe that it all popped out of nowhere. He just made it appear out of nothingness. 6 years ago  
Same with God aparently. 6 years ago  
God's existence cannot be proved or disproved. Also, some researchers are now attempting to show that Jesus never even existed. Idk if thats true or not, but I know there's scientific evidence behind it. 6 years ago  
Evolution IS mutations. Literally, every mutation is evolution occurring. We have in fact seen one organism evolving into another. We genetically engineered flies to be born with additional eyes and legs. That is sufficent to be considered a new species. They were capable of reproducing. This was evolution through artificial selection. You may not believe in natural-selection based evolution, but evolution itself is a fact. 6 years ago  
Can we see the core of the Earth? No. Can we create a machine which will allow us to? Yes. Cannot say the same about God. 6 years ago  
Let me point out to you that the Big Bang theory does NOT say that something was created out of nothing. Wherever you learned that, it was false. 6 years ago  
And conservatives/authoritarians are trying to push their biased lies so they can control them instead, but are not succeeding. 6 years ago  
No, we did not come from modern day monkeys. Yes, we share a common ancestor as thebananaking said. Yes, they have evolved and are evolving even now. 6 years ago  
Then I guess you've never heard of creationism. 6 years ago +1
Yes, yes you are. 6 years ago  
evolution is as much as pseudoscience as christianity is a cult. 6 years ago +1
I'll reply to anyone who says that we evolved from monkeys: We did not evolve from monkeys. We evolved from an ape-like hominid which resembles monkey-like hominids. Monkeys evolved from the same ancestor. 6 years ago  
No, we did not. That is a popular misconsception. We did not evolve from modern day monkeys. Rather, they evolved from a common ancestor of ours which we also evolved from. It wasn't a monkey. It was an ape-like hominid. 6 years ago  
Not ment to be taken literally. 6 years ago  
There are also many anti-atheists who denounce atheists as inhuman monsters who will burn in hell. 6 years ago  
Agreed. 6 years ago  
Thank you for taking the time to make an actually well-made comment rather than just saying "you're wrong." 6 years ago  
Regardless of what Hitler was, you cannot use him effectively in this argument. I don't know if you know this or not, but Hitler was against smoking because he was intelligent enough to know of its negative effects. Does that mean "Hitler was against smoking, so those who oppose smoking are bad" is a good argument to make? No. 6 years ago  
Guess what? Hitler was very intelligent, and there's no denying that. If he was an atheist, that information doesn't in any way harm atheists. 6 years ago  
This is also implying that Hitler was justified in his actions because he was merely God's pawn doing God's work. 6 years ago  
Do you believe it is right for God to condemn the descendants of Pontius Pilot, who had absolutely no control over his actions? By my opinion, no reasonable or merciful god would keep such a curse. 6 years ago  
One reason, is the same reason politics talk down on certain issues that they actually believe in. Public support and political image. 6 years ago  
Blind to superstition and myths, perhaps. 6 years ago +2
You've just proved your lack of intelligence. 6 years ago +2
I think it was some very intelligent people instead. 6 years ago  
Tell that to the religious schools. 6 years ago +1
By "God was thought to be the creation" he ment "God was thought to have been the reason behind the creation." 6 years ago  
Don't be rude, you're only making us look bad. 6 years ago  
We have evidence of both. Evidence does not constitute proof. Evidence does not validate something, it merely supports that thing's likelihood. 6 years ago  
htt p://ww w.big-ba ng-theory.com/ a quick google search led me here. You can always look for more yourself. 6 years ago  
He can't prove it and you can't disprove it. Proof is impossible to achieve on both parties. 6 years ago +1
Indeed. 6 years ago  
fries* 6 years ago  
Whitecastle has great burgers but I just can't get used to their frys 6 years ago  
Depends on how hot or cold, but I prefer cold. 6 years ago  
I've chosen things on rrrather that would get me legally capable of being executed/jailed for life. Also, I'd be dead, as many rrrather questions ask "would you rather die like this right now or like this right now" 6 years ago +2
Actually, I can vouche for him that he chose neither. If you choose an option, it registers it on the website. If you let a week or so pass and choose a different option, it switches your vote. Most people click a picture instead of the "skip" feature to see comments. Proof: Scroll below and you'll see my vote for puppies 6 years ago  
No, I'm pretty sure he made an intelligent comment on his opinion on the matter. You on the other hand, did not post an intelligent response. Hence, you are the dumbass. 6 years ago +4
I would like to point out that condoms, depending on the brand and the intelligence of the user, are only 75-95% effective. Many people don't know how to properly use a condom (there's more to it than just putting it on) which results in broken condoms, etc. 6 years ago +2
9-11 because it was more recent. If the Holocaust never happened, one of the Jews may have married one of my parents and I would not have been born. 6 years ago  
Godwin's law. Your argument is made invalid. 6 years ago +5
haha i know that feel :( 6 years ago +1
This. 6 years ago +4
For some reason your diction does not allude to that of a 10 year old. 6 years ago +2
But... but... "levaticus is just metaphors and stuff!" haha... levaticus is an abomination and most Christians should have abandoned it by now. 6 years ago  
Delete yvpil057 wrote just now:Posting... But... but... "levaticus is just metaphors and stuff!" haha... levaticus is an abomination and most Christians should have abandoned it by now. 6 years ago  
Beliefs in general are silly. 6 years ago +1
I'd hate to break it to you, but "scientifically proven" is a paradox. There is no such thing as proving something in the field of science. You can support something, but you cannot prove it. 6 years ago +7
Indeed that is a metaphor 6 years ago +1
But I'll go ahead and answer. First off, what you wrote is "you believe" instead of "you believe in" meaning you would have to add in an effect clause to your cause clause. If you believe something.... something may or may not happen. You did not include that. Now assuming you ment "I believe in blowing you up, etc." that would make slightly more sense. The answer is you can. Yes. You can believe that. You can't act on it without consequences, but you can believe it. Just like people can believe in sexism or racism, but cannot act on it or they get punished. 6 years ago  
What the hell did you even try to accomplish by this worthless example.... 6 years ago +1
So... you demand that people do what you say, but you refuse to do what other people tell you? If you're not willing to look something up, dont think anyone will listen to you telling them to read something. 6 years ago  
how did it what? 6 years ago  
Can you please just get it through your head that the Big Bang is NOT "something coming from nothing." The Big Bang theory is everything existing in a hypercondensed form, until it expanded outward during the Big Bang event, and is continuing to expand today. All of the matter in the universe existed prior to the Big Bang in that hyper-condensed form. 6 years ago +1
You trying to ninja my image :( 6 years ago  
Obviously clicking one choice over another dictates an individual's intelligence. 6 years ago  
Where's your disproof? 6 years ago +2
That gave me a good laugh. 6 years ago  
The same can be said of people assuming that "No God" automatically means Atheist. There are religions without a god, such as Buddhism. 6 years ago  
Ignore the troll please. You're only feeding him. 6 years ago  
And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to look at the video I posted, as most people usually don't bother to :) 6 years ago  
I'm not atheist. 6 years ago  
Actually I'm deist. But thank you for showing that there are many religious people who are idiots. 6 years ago  
Yes, as Random1234 points out, your information here is written in the wrong order. The universe is that which holds all of the millions of galaxies. The Milky Way galaxy has millions of stars, not universes. If you believe in millions of universes, that is a multiverse, not a galaxy. 6 years ago  
College, and all of its expences, assuming you would pay $50,000 tuition per year for an expencive college and $20,000 for room and board, you would only spend $280,000. Add in food and luxury expences (such as going on dates, taking vacations, educational travels), you would spend roughly $500,000 assuming you're living leisurely yet intelligently. Double this for an 8-year degree. With $3 million to $4 million, you could easily afford to buy a car. 6 years ago +2
"All I wanted was to say honestly to people: 'Have a look at yourselves and see how bad and dreary your lives are!' The important thing is that people should realize that, for when they do, they will most certainly create another and better life for themselves. I will not live to see it, but I know that it will be quite different, quite unlike our present life. And so long as this different life does not exist, I shall go on saying to people again and again: 'Please, understand that your life is bad and dreary!'" 6 years ago  
2nd controvercy: Women armed with guns... the only way this would logically solve the problem is that the women would have to threaten and (when threats don't work) shoot/kill the rapist. Now, using your argument that women can simply fake the rape, you're basically giving such women more power in murdering the men they hate. Sure, they can do that now too, but with more accessibility to guns, the rate of such happenings would increase. "Solving" one problem has created numerous others. 6 years ago  
Controvercy: With less restrictions on guns, it becomes easier for gang members, domestic terrorists, and those with criminal intentions to get them. The more people with guns, the higher the crime rates because given a population, a certain % of that population will have criminal intent. 6 years ago  
2nd controvercy: Women armed with guns... the only way this would logically solve the problem is that the women would have to shoot and kill the rapist. 6 years ago  
Big Bang theory doesn't say that something was created out of nothing. 6 years ago  
Yes, yes, it's much more difficult to explain how we have life than to just claim "God did it." When people couldn't understand or explain the phenomenon of rain, thunder, lightning, etc. they said "God did it." 6 years ago +1
oh and you'll have to get rid of the spaces in the url if you're willing to take a look at it 6 years ago +1
I believe in evolution. Actually, that's an understatement. I know in my mind that without a doubt evolution occurred. Whether it was created/invented by God or not can be debated though. Essencially, life was created from simple elements and energy. The elements formed complex molecules. Those molecules then began to coagulate based on need. For example, hydrophobic molecules clustered together in order to avoid as much contact with H2O as possible, forming phospholipid layers in the process. If you have a minute, watch this video. I'll spare you the boring task of having to read some 1000 words. htt p://w ww.youtube.co m/w atch?v=xokbvgdKZww 13:45 - the important part (all of it is interesting imo) 6 years ago +2
I suppose it depends on you. Whether or not you choose to believe in creationism or evolution dictates the answer. Since neither you nor I will likely go deeply into studying either side of the aspect, our belief will suffice as to how this impacts our life. Now I'll get to the point with the below comment. 6 years ago +1
We are by no means perfect... 6 years ago  
A law is simply a widely accepted theory. Meaning, all laws are theories. We haven't explored enough of the universe to confirm that gravity always works according to the current laws. 6 years ago  
It wasn't for peace. Think back to the crusades. It was for personal benefit. 6 years ago +1
Look up the God Helmet. 6 years ago +1
"Nothing created everything" is a false statement which is not what the Big Bang is. Whoever told you that simply did not know the actual theory. 6 years ago +2
If only it were that simple... 6 years ago  
Somehow I managed to switch my vote. I dislike this. 6 years ago  
cheaply made doesn't necessarily mean ineffectual :) 6 years ago +1
Let me ask you a simple question: Why should Christianity be the 'correct' religion? What about all of the others? You might see in a few years, that there is a lot you do not yet know. Your opinion may very well change to that of those who voted for the B.Bang theory. 6 years ago +5
I changed my mind. Pen. 6 years ago  
A well put answer. 6 years ago +2
But flame wars are so fun! You get to point out the stupidity and ignorance in the comments of those who blatantly attack the other side without any consideration of how vulgar and rude they are :D 6 years ago +6
I didn't say that evolution is the only option. There's also the option of creation followed by evolution. However, there's no option that doesn't have at least some of the aspects of evolution in it. 6 years ago  
You're missing the sarcastic aspect of my comment. 6 years ago +2
Gravity is a fact because we can test it for validity at any point in time and get the result immediately. Whereas if we want to test God's existence (by prayer, or other such methods), we would not get an immediate result. Also, many such results could be coincidence, whereas gravity cannot be a coincidence on the planet Earth. I must point out though that Gravity is a scientific theory. We have not fully explored all of the regions of the universe in which such laws may function differently or not exist at all. 6 years ago  
I wouldn't convert to anything... I would remain agnostic/Deist. 6 years ago  
What you have described is evolution. Basic genetic mutations over thousands or millions of generations result in the changing of one species into another. 6 years ago +2
We have scorpions :P 6 years ago  
no incest ftw 6 years ago +6
I'm scared of assassination attempts. 6 years ago  
Perhaps one day, if it should ever happen that CPS gains the power to enforce protective laws in every household, I would change my mind on this part of the argument. 6 years ago  
Hitler was also against smoking... does that make it a good argument for smokers to use against non-smoking laws? 6 years ago  
Paul is old as hell... I'm surprised people don't make heart attack jokes, etc. about him like they did about McCain... but I still like him more than Romney just based on a few specific policies 6 years ago +2
"had it your way" implies I'm the man in the relationship :P 6 years ago  
Borel's "law" isn't a law at all. It's a complete and utter joke in the scientific world. It should more clearly be labeled as "Borel's hypothesis" because in no way was this tested to be right, ever. Frankly, I can come up with a test right now that disproves it. According to him, if the odds of something happening are 1*10^50 to 1, it will never happen. Wrong. With a random number generater on a computer with 1*10^50 1 numbers, the probability of any single number coming out is lower than that ratio. Yet, a number will still appear with the random number generator, and that number disproves the so-called "law." 6 years ago  
Borel's "law" isn't a law at all. It's a complete and utter joke in the scientific world. It should more clearly be labeled as "Borel's hypothesis" because in no way was this tested to be right, ever. Frankly, I can come up with a test right now that disproves it. According to him, if the odds of something happening are 1*10^50 to 1, it will never happen. Wrong. With a random number generater on a computer with 1*10^50 1 numbers, the probability of any single number coming out is higher than that ratio. Yet, a number will still appear with the random number generator, and that number disproves the so-called "law." 6 years ago  
Evolution did happen lol... we see it in everyday life. 6 years ago  
There are no "odds" for evolution. It happened, and it's happening right now. Your argument is like trying to tell someone who won the same lottery 10x in a row that the person's winnings are a fairy tail because the odds are next to zero of that happening. 6 years ago  
I agree with this message. 6 years ago  
I just have to say this: No such thing as proof. 6 years ago +2
Thanks :) I'd love to rest in peace 6 years ago +2
Dear ignorant, religiously conceited, religiously intolerant bigot: We are tired of your overgeneralized, small-minded view of those who don't practice your religion. Please, keep acting the way you do, because compared to your vulgarity, nearly all atheists are better people than you. So, in your own words, "shut your face." - sincerely, the Atheists. 6 years ago +1
Winning multiple lotteries has greater odds than god existing 6 years ago  
You sir, have a colorful vocabulary. 6 years ago  
Actually, your parents created you. 6 years ago +1
Believing in something doesn't make it fact. Even if a lot of people believe in it. 6 years ago +2
He doesn't believe in hell, hence he won't go to hell. 6 years ago +1
The idea of going to hell for not believing in God is preposterous. What about all the people who lived before religion was created? What about those isolated African bush-men who don't have any contact with society and don't have gods? Preposterous. 6 years ago +1
Anyone who thinks that other's beliefs are retarded is retarded to say the least. 6 years ago  
Anyone who thinks that other's beliefs are retarded is retarded to say the least. 6 years ago  
Wrong. There is a direct relationship between solid matter and energy. Energy can be converted into solid matter, and solid matter can be converted into energy. 6 years ago +1
It's better to say "Without religion we would be twice as technologically advanced." 6 years ago +1
No, what he's talking about is the dark ages, where religious crazies condemned science and burned books/destroyed information, etc. 6 years ago +1
Smoking is stupid... it's better to smoke pot than tobacco.... 6 years ago +4
No, they're not free. However, they're not nearly as expencive as a C-section, especially if the insurance of the individual doesn't cover C-sections. 6 years ago  
The difference is that starving people in the ghetto have already experienced life. 6 years ago +1
Have at thee! Thy sword shalt not pierce flesh 'ere eve. 6 years ago +3
I have brown eyes, but I love blue eyes to death. 6 years ago  
If I was gay... then I'd have nothing against having relations with men. I'd rather be a gay than an ignorant bigot. 6 years ago +10
Yes. 6 years ago  
Could easily use yahoo. 6 years ago +2
Both are insignificant. 6 years ago +7
Sanity... is for the weak. 6 years ago +3
During development, a human embryo looks more like a fish or lizzard than it does a human being. When it's considered to become "a human being" is subject to opinion and interpretation. Some believe it's only when the baby is born. Others, when it loses its tail and starts looking human. Some think it's when the zygote forms. I believe in the middle. 6 years ago  
I don't think hitler has any part in this subject. 6 years ago +1
Depending on the situation, yes you do. It's all about circumstances. 6 years ago +1
But think of how many cases there are, where CPS fails to find such a case. They're definately not perfect. 6 years ago  
Fixed. You can be pro choice and be against the excessive use of abortion as an alternative to birth control. 6 years ago  
Pro Choice means you're in favor of giving women a choice on the matter. Pro life means you take that choice away regardless of circumstance. 6 years ago  
Actually, it would only begin developing human features at the 7-8th week. 6 years ago  
1% is enough to justify abortions. I'm saying that abortion should not be made illegal 100%. I'm saying it should be limited and regulated, but still available for certain situations that would directly harm the mother or force the pregnancy on her. 6 years ago  
You're not considering all of the possibilities (though I might not be either) - First off, I'm not saying that giving birth will kill you. If you scroll thorough my comments, not once did I say "Will kill." l2fedFire said "could" die. Your first reponse to this was "well they should have thought about that before sex." To which I replied that you're forcing the person to die. Death is extremely rare, yes, but it is not completely nonexistent. Some people can't afford a safe c-section procedure even if they have insurance. You also overestimate the intelligence of many individuals on birth control. Some don't even know what a condom does, or how to use it. 6 years ago  
normally, it doesn't. However, there are rare situations, and currently, C-sections aren't free. If they were, my opinion would be quite different on this matter. 6 years ago  
The morning after pill preventing the birth of the baby by never allowing the sperm and egg to meet, that is. 6 years ago  
Sorry for not making it entirely clear what I ment, but I didn't confuse the morning after pill with the Abortion Pill RU486. The Aspiration Procedure and the Abortion Pill were both things I neglected to add into that post. My vague comparison was in that both methods prevent the birth of a baby. 6 years ago  
A woman who becomes pregnant due to an act of either rape or incest is the victim of a horribly violent and morally reprehensible crime. Although pregnancy as a result of either rape or incest is extremely rare, there is no getting around the fact that pregnancy does occur in some instances. 6 years ago  
@Random12345 - However, you can get a surgical abortion as early as the 5th week. However, you don't have to have any kinds of surgery to have an abortion. A "morning after pill" is pretty much the same as an abortion, but without the surgery. Also, Early Abortion is abortion performed during the earliest stages of pregnancy, between 5 and 10 weeks from the first day of a woman’s last period. This is the ideal time to seek an abortion because of the extremely small quantity of pregnancy tissue that exists. Most women do not realize that if they are this early in their pregnancy, they do not need a surgical abortion (the method most often offered at traditional abortion clinics). So, to prevent the 'kicking and hearing,' you could limit abortion to the first 5-8 weeks instead of making it entirely illegal. 6 years ago  
Please... that's like watching a PETA ad on vegetarianism/veganism. People can easily make equally convincing propaganda the other way too. 6 years ago  
@random12345 As I mentioned in my first reply, you can have an abortion when the zygote doesn't even have a single heart cell. When it doesn't have arms or legs to kick or ears to listen. A zygote is officially considered a fetus at the 8th month of development, when it begins to develop body parts, but you can have an abortion even before that. 6 years ago  
The comments are getting too condensed so the below is my reply. 6 years ago  
Then I assume you would be in favor of getting rid of the religion of "Christain Scientists" who don't believe in using modern medicine, to the extent where they would rather have their children die than to give them medicine. Am I right in assuming this? If so, [though in my honest opinion I believe this religion should not exist just like Westboro] then the U.S. wouldn't truly have freedom of religion, now would it? So if we're willing to accept such religions that effectively kill their post-birth children, why can't we be willing to let people have abortions? 6 years ago  
She/He's not saying that his or her belief does matter, he/she's saying that only the woman in question (who is considering an abortion) has the belief that matters. To a certain extent, I agree. The point being, you shouldn't impose your beliefs on others. For example, if you believe gay marriage is a sin, don't get married to a homosexual. You don't have to go yelling at gays that they are a crime against God. If you believe abortion is murder, don't have one. But if someone is going to have one for whatever reason, don't go yelling at them that it's a crime against life. I'm not saying you shouldn't try to talk them out of it, I'm saying you should not force them to have no choices. 6 years ago  
He wouldn't be consciously alive. 6 years ago  
Not necessarily. You can have an abortion when the zygote doesn't even have a single heart cell, let alone a beating heart. 6 years ago +1
At the cost of destroying her own body? 6 years ago +1
2 things. 1) It is not a baby. It is a zygote. Killing a zygote is the same as killing an egg cell or a sperm cell, since it has no nerve cells to feel pain and no brain cells to understand that it is alive. Hence, it is not yet sentient, making it no different than a skin cell. This is my opinion though, so I'm not saying yours is wrong. However, 2) You're wrong. "They should have thought... before sex." The first thing you're saying with this is that those who didn't think, now have to die. So it's better to let someone who is well aware of life die because of a mistake in life? No. Also, what about those who DID think about it? Condoms are only about 75-80% effective. You can still get pregnant even if you use birth control. What about religion? A catholic man could lie to his girlfriend or wife about using a condom. Rare, but much more common than rape. 6 years ago +1
Agree. 6 years ago  
No it doesn't. 6 years ago  
You don't always have the choice of having sex or not. Rape is one example, but it is not the only one. You could be mentally impaired and not understand what you are doing, etc. 6 years ago  
I feel sad that I can't remember the name of the guy on the left.. 6 years ago +1
Hot coffee 6 years ago  
Subway! 6 years ago +2
EA Games has a lot more to offer than the CoD game series, which has what... less than 10 games? 6 years ago +4
usually get paid more and are more well known world-wide. 6 years ago +4
Not necessarily. You could believe that God created the Big Bang. Then, you could vote for the Big Bang, since it would have been what created the world in your opinion. 6 years ago  
Cmon man... you're making people who voted for the B.Bang look bad.... 6 years ago  
Though I guess that can't be said for insects, but then again, those aren't dogs. 6 years ago  
Sure they are. You're taking an innocent life regardless of what kind it is. 6 years ago +2
Humans are also just animals. Therefore, we either do not have souls or dogs also have souls. Retard. 6 years ago +2
Yes, a human is better than a puppy. However, who are you to say dogs do not have souls? Who are you to decide what others believe? Humans don't have souls either, is what I believe. So there. 6 years ago +1
Well... seeing as how I wouldn't be alive to know what happened, I wouldn't be able to like or not like it. 6 years ago +3
Random chance is very well a possibility. 6 years ago +5
Japanese Bigot! 6 years ago +3
I'd have to agree. From what I know of it, the B.B. is not by any means a fact. We have much to learn before we can make such a claim. 6 years ago +1
The Bible was written by man, not God. Man tells us that God created the earth. On a side note, I've considered my beliefs and I've reconsidered them many a times. I have no doubt in my mind that I will reconsider them again some time in the future. However, I remain adamant in my belief that the Bible is nothing more than a tool of propaganda invented by humans in order to control and appease the masses. 6 years ago +1
Reading the Bible would be the same as reading about the Big Bang in a science book. 6 years ago +2
Unless they stabbed you in the lower spinal chord and worked their way up :P 6 years ago  
If the love lasts, yes. If she decides a few months later that I'm too poor and can't provide for her, and leaves me, I'd rather have the money. 6 years ago +3
Unlike Kristyg, I'm on the opposite end. I drink... a TON of soda. However, I rarely eat junk food or fast food (with the exception of Subway). Last time I was in McDonalds was.... probably last summer. Last time I had a bag of chips was 2 weeks ago. 6 years ago +2
This is true. This is proven by Thai martial artists who hit their legs against palm trees to creat microfractures. 6 years ago  
Thats debatable. The Luftwaffe were one of Germany's strongest forces. 6 years ago  
takes a long time 6 years ago +2
I don't want to see their nasty old-people parts. Idc if they catch me doing it, I'll just quickly cover myself and tell them to gtfo. 6 years ago +1
Any idea how many people would die? 6 years ago +1
I'm a cat person. 6 years ago +2
How can you see it after drinking? 6 years ago +2
Honestly depends on the kind. I hate carrot cake. I hate chicken pot pie 6 years ago +6
Russia has more numbers, so without nukes in an all-out war, I believe Russia would win. However, there would really be no winner, since both countries would be devastated to the point of complete destruction. They would likely be damaged beyond repair regardless of who wins, if it is an all-out war without nukes. 6 years ago  
I actually mistaked juggalo for gigolo. 6 years ago +1
Do you know what a juggalo is? 6 years ago  
The crazier the chick, the crazier the sex. 6 years ago +11
I could manage. 6 years ago  
However, I must point out that the Global Climate Change (a much more appropriate way to describe it) is not just caused by human greenhouse gases. It is also caused by a) the sun expanding naturally on its path to becoming a Red Giant, b) Gasses released not by human emittions, but by things like volcanos, animals, etc. c) Polar Ice Caps melting - less ice means less reflection of sunlight back into space, meaning more gets left in the oceans, which in turn melts more ice and this repeats infinitely. 6 years ago +3
"Global Warming" is incorrectly labled by many as "our planet is heating up everywhere." In actuality, Global Warming is causing warming in some areas and cooling in other areas. 6 years ago +4
I enjoy classical music. 6 years ago +4
Don't even understand how baseball is "the world series" when the world doesn't even recognize baseball as a sport outside the U.S. 6 years ago +8
Well... if you believe in God creating the Big Bang, you could still vote for the Big Bang and believe in God at the same time. 6 years ago  
I somewhat agree with this. 6 years ago  
I have a controvercial view on this. Both war and world hunger are necessary for population control. However, I voted World Hunger because people who go to war often choose to go (unless they are drafted.forced). If you're willing to die for your country, I think thats way better than dying of hunger unwillingly. 6 years ago  
But we can't stop war if we have world hunger either :( 6 years ago  
yay 3000th vote! 6 years ago  
Gravity is a theory. 6 years ago +1
You have no source for a counterclaim... hence you are equally invalidated. 6 years ago +3
The multiverse. 6 years ago +2
There's also more evidence of unicorns existing than God existing. 6 years ago +2
His comment applies to the "you better vote for god you people" implying that god will punish you if you don't vote for him. Nope, no reason to vote for him out of fear. 6 years ago +2
I like you. You're one of the few intelligent people on this website. 6 years ago +1
You wouldn't notice the gap of time between death and revival. 6 years ago  
I've written over 15,000 words in comments. Only asked about 25-30 questions. 6 years ago +2
I wish you could go to jail for bullying... there were so many bullies at my schools but the adults hardly gave a damn. 6 years ago  
I'd join the police. 6 years ago +3
I haven't seen you on in a while 6 years ago  
GUYS! A snuff film is where people are bruitally slaughtered or murdered for the pleasure of the murderer. It sometimes involves sex, either prior to, after, or during the killing. I'm guessing that a protracted snuff film is "a real snuff film" where a real murderer murders you and records it. 6 years ago +2
The image looks so beautiful. 6 years ago +1
I can't imagine ever fking a yellow woman with huge eyes that take up more space than the rest of her face 6 years ago +3
on the right they look like some disgusting vomit color 6 years ago +1
I prefer completely solid food. 6 years ago +3
I love ass... so much... if it's fresh from the shower I'd do more than just kiss it. 6 years ago +6
I was told that plastic bottles leech chemicals into the drink. Dunno if cans do, but I chose them because they just feel more convenient to me. 6 years ago  
I could ask them about their lives and write stories about them 6 years ago +1
I want to add one final thing: I don't support "abortions." I support the right to make the decition whether or not to abort. 6 years ago +7
If you consider the sperm and the egg cell meeting, a potential "baby," then you may as well consider every sperm and egg cell a baby too. Each and every egg cell (and most non-deformed sperm cells) can become a potential baby. So, every month a woman isn't pregnant, she is killing 1 or more potential babies. Is that murder? No, it's not. Just because the egg cell has a potential to become a baby doesn't make it one. Same with a zygote/fetus. It's only potentially a baby. It can die from natural causes in the womb, just like an egg cell. 6 years ago +2
No. It's not a stupid thing to say. It means that men should have no voice in the matter since they can't get pregnant. 6 years ago  
Until it is born, it has no rights. "Birth-given rights" 6 years ago  
A clump of cells meaning it cannot think, cannot interact with its invironment actively, has no brain activity, cannot feel pain, and has no distinct human features yet. 6 years ago  
Smart mothers don't have abortions unless they're completely sure that it's what they need. 6 years ago +1
It's not a baby. 6 years ago +1
not at all murder... 6 years ago +1
What trents was saying, or at least the way I interpreted it, was that "There are already plenty of children available for adoption. By giving this child up for adoption, if a family adopts this child, this child took the place of another potential child that could have been adopted." 6 years ago  
murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. How is the death penalty, a lawful act that is only implemented in extreme cases and needs a lot of conditions to be met before it can be carried out, murder? 6 years ago  
No, they kill fetuses. A fetus is not a baby. 6 years ago +1
Ahh... having to know that your child is being raised somewhere else, knowing that they probably know little to nothing about you and probably don't like you for giving them away... 6 years ago  
Then why do you? 6 years ago +1
here was mine - //www.rrrather.com/view/4770 6 years ago  
How long ago did you submit yours? I also submitted quite a few on this topic 6 years ago  
Adoption does not solve rape pregnancies. 6 years ago +1
lol..... you can't just say adoption and think you've solved rape. Have you considered financial aspects? What if it's a little 13 year old girl that got raped and became pregnant? You want her to die giving birth? 6 years ago +1
It's not a baby. 6 years ago +1
Agreed. 6 years ago +2
Abortions happen naturally all the time, whenever a sperm and egg cell meet but are not compatible to the extent that the baby will be deformed mentally or physically. When this happens, the cygote sometimes undergoes a natural abortion... Apoptosis I believe its called. I'll look it up later. Anyway, how is this any different from aborting the baby through a surgical procedure because you already know from tests that it will be born very heavily disabled? 6 years ago +2
Here's my input on the matter: Abortion should be legal. However, it should not be used as a form of birth control to replace condoms or pills. I believe a woman should be allowed 1 abortion per lifetime, not counting abortions of rape-induced pregnancies. 6 years ago  
So you're saying "ignorance is bliss" 6 years ago  
What's the difference between biologically natural abortions and artificial abortions? 6 years ago +1
Abortion is not murder. If it is, then nearly all women who will have sex during their lifetime will have a natural abortion. 6 years ago +2
It's not a "human being." It's a clump of cells. There is no brain activity. Also, if you abort the zygote when it has started to grow arms/lets, it has a tail and more closely resembles an amphibian than a human. 6 years ago  
So... you want the woman to go through the pain of birth, after having to go through the pain of rape.... gj... 6 years ago  
Frankly, the "human being" is just a clump of cells. Abortions happen naturally, too. So, if abortions are murder, then a large part of the female population are murderers. Do those cells count as a living being? They're alive, but they aren't concious, or self-aware, so they are not a being. 6 years ago  
This would indeed be a good idea to consider. However, it may not be a good idea to add after all things being considered. Although I believe that there should be a downvote button, there are implications. For example, some people who are downvoted may be upset that everybody hates what they wrote. This may influence them to leave the site or perhaps delete their comment (even if it was a good one, but was downvoted by the voters of the other choice). 6 years ago +1
By that statement, any planet "can" support life. You can terraform pretty much any planet. Add heat to cold planets. Add shielding from the sun to hot planets. Extract the gas out of a Gas Giant. (And a bunch of other things ofcourse). There's a difference between "can support life" and "can be made to support life." 6 years ago +2
A 9 year old on the other hand, would likely not know what she's getting into, and would be scarred for life (literally, both emotionally and physically). 6 years ago  
I honestly don't see why it's considered wrong or disgusting to have sex with your sister... The only bad thing about incest is that the children are more likely to be deformed. Use condom = absolutely no bad things from incest. 6 years ago +1
Walruses have one of the largest penis sizes in the world. your holes would get permanently destroyed. 6 years ago +3
It's just a horse with an extra bone. I don't want a horse. 6 years ago +4
I'm actually rather surprised at the results. I thought more would vote for A because they could memorize a bunch of past winning lottery numbers and stock trends on the market and then make all the money they would ever need like that, all while being able to relive their life without making childhood mistakes onset by lack of experience. (I accidentally voted B just now and it switched my vote) 6 years ago  
Also, because just as there is no proof of B.B. and evolution, there is no proof of God either. 6 years ago  
Scientific definition of Theory is almost identical to fact. 6 years ago  
Evolution is the result of a prolonged chain of mutations. An organism gets a mutation. If that mutation improves it's ability to survive, the offspring with the mutation will eventually outnumber or even overwhelm those without it. Evolution has occurred. 6 years ago  
I believe it because I am a Deist. 6 years ago  
Umm... Budhists don't believe in a God, but they're generally not considered atheists. 6 years ago  
In my personal opinion, yes. Even if it's cruel and stupid. 6 years ago  
Judging by the images, the bird is completely retarded. I see nothing bad about the big cat. 6 years ago  
Rude. 6 years ago +2
You're dumb... look up what pastafarianism is. 6 years ago +3
Btw, for those who don't know, pastafarianism is a legitimate parrody religion. It's not just some random thing that people make up every now and then. Both the flying spaghetti monster and the pink unicorn are key parts of it. 6 years ago  
In that case, a skinny girl can have curves too. 6 years ago  
nose pierce is way smaller. 6 years ago  
Planets that can support life have already been discovered. It is almost gauronteed that life has formed on them. The question is, to what extent has life evolved and whether or not it will ever be sentient. 6 years ago  
Actually, microbe life has already been found in fossils on Mars via the Rover vehicle. Sure, they're not alive, but it confirms that life was once present on at least one other planet. There can be no doubt that this is true for other galaxies/solar systems. 6 years ago +1
If you get your head out of your ass, it says that the Bible isn't the only religious text in the world. Also, not everyone believes in God. Dumbasss. 6 years ago +3
hud 6 years ago  
Racism is an invalid argument because all humans are racist. 6 years ago  
Well, the last time I checked, there are 3 branches of government, not just one. 6 years ago  
Honestly I doubt you know half of what Obama knows about running a country properly. 6 years ago  
I don't believe the President has the power to make that decision alone. 6 years ago  
No, he can get away with anything because he's a good politician and a good talker. One of the most important aspects of a politician as far as getting a position of power is to be able to convice others that certain actions will be taken. Such "campaign promises" that end up being lies can be seen in every presidency since campaigning began. Obama's not the only liar. All of them lied about one thing or another. I prefer Ron Paul over Obama for a number of reasons, but I highly doubt that Ron Paul has not lied a single time in his campaign. 6 years ago  
I think the point New Hampshire guest was trying to make was that Obama is not THE WORST president in this country. Others in the past have been far worse. Lyndon B Johnson in my opinion was worse. 6 years ago  
To be fair, a lot of people do the exact same for Ron Paul. 6 years ago +2
Who is to say that 1. is symbolic and 2. isn't? The Bible was written back when the concept of millions of years probably didn't exist, let alone billions. I could very easily say that this part of the Bible is symbolic of the mentioned "God days." As for reviewing the definition of "day," I did. According to Free Online Dictionary, the word day has 8 definitions. 2 of which apply to what I wrote - "A period of time in history." and days being "Period of life or activity." Hence, my use of "God Days" is correct. Investigate all of the variations yourself before you tell people to review it. For the sake of being a hypocrit, I suggest you review the definition of relativity. I suggest the 2 (Philosophy) from the source I mentioned earlier. 6 years ago  
:( 6 years ago  
I prefer skinny girls over fat girls. 6 years ago +3
Can I still go on vacation/travel 6 years ago  
I'm not gay so.... 6 years ago  
yeah so he means 50% disagrees wth Heather. 6 years ago +1
I've got passion in my pants and I'm not afraid to show it... show it... I'm sexy and I know it. 6 years ago +4
ask her if you can watch LOL... I have no problem having a gay son though.. 6 years ago +2
lol if thats what you think then why are you here? 6 years ago +1
I believe it's called "Adventure Time" 6 years ago  
It's a Cartoon Network cartoon in the U.S. 6 years ago  
I prefer a colder climate. Also, KU's mascot looks... retarded. I'm sorry but that's how I feel. 6 years ago +1
Well... at least I'm not a werewolf. 6 years ago +7
Sell it for $$$ profit 6 years ago +5
Not true. This was a false claim ment to attack the homosexual community. The reality is, AIDS transmissions are very easy to have, regardless of gender. The only reason why homosexual transmittions appear to be higher is because homosexuals tend to switch partners much faster than heterosexual couples. 6 years ago  
I re-read that and it seemed to me like I'm calling you the 400 pound lady. I'm not. Sorry if I made it sound that way. 6 years ago  
Well... that depends on how bad the body looks. Sure, the body is not the only important thing (in fact, its not the first thing I look for in a girl) but there are limits. I'm not going to date a 400 pound lady no matter how nice her personality/face/morals/etc. is. 6 years ago  
This all came to me as soon as read @Guest from North Carolina's post. Just popped int my mind and I felt like writing it. 6 years ago  
WHAT IF! @in response to Guest fom North Carolina (3 posts below me) - What if the supercondenced matter that exploded and came to be known as the Big Bang... WAS GOD! Da da daaaaa.... No seriously though, this should be considered. Why should God be a person? The idea that we are modeled after his image is repulsive and if someone wants to challenge me on this, i'll reply to their comment. Anyway, lets say that the supercondenced mass itself was God. Now, it can be said that the supercondenced mass always existed. It exists currenly too and always will exist (because it's just spread out now. If you condense all the matter in the universe, you would get that "god" mass again. Stay with me now, it says in various religious texts that God created the universe and humans, etc. Well... if the Big Bang mass of matter was God, then this is true. "God" aka the Big Bang, would have created everything in existence and eventually through evolution and natural selection and whatnot, humans would have entered the picture. So through an indirect means, God created humans. What about the whole "6 days and rested on the 7th" thing? Well... who says these are human days? "day" is relative. A day on earth is not the same length as a day on Neptune or Mars. For all we know, a "God" day could be billions of years in our prespective. In my opinion, we have to distinguish between the religious text that alludes to possible realities and the religious text that is complete mumbo jumbo created to control the masses or simply through the inclusion of biased humans in the picture. This is why I don't believe in Adam and Eve. I believe its mumbo jumbo created by primitive humans in an effort to appease the masses as well as control them (because, if God created humans, he must be strong, can punish me, and I better pay the religious leaders my time and money to avoid eternal suffering!). If you are still reading this, I hope my little rant entertained you. 6 years ago  
You can believe in life after death and not believe in God. See reincarnation. 6 years ago  
Well... actually I've had times where I wished I had been an abortion. 6 years ago +1
For better or for worse. 6 years ago +6
lol read up on my posts from about a week ago. 6 years ago  
oh my god yes 6 years ago  
Sea glass. 6 years ago  
You don't feel pain while dreaming. Also, I would attempt to take control of the dream via lucid dreaming. 6 years ago +5
The point of the site is to answer! Even if it's gross, disgusting, disturbing, immoral, or flat out evil. 6 years ago +13
... better to have 4 friends than no friends. 6 years ago +3
Burt seems slightly more mature. 6 years ago +1
Rape. 6 years ago +3
Show a little tolerance, people. 6 years ago +1
How is this website false and "sladerous?" I think you're overreacting or perhaps are butthurt that your side isn't winning. Umad? 6 years ago +1
No. Nobody here is wrong, except for those who blindly deny the possibility of the other viewpoint. This goes for both God believers, Big Bang believers, and those who believe in both alike. 6 years ago +1
Hmm... no. You are an absolute retard for being so rude. Hence, your argument (which makes me sad because I believe in the Big Bang) is made invalid. 6 years ago  
I'm glad at least some people are showing a decent amount of tolerance for the other viewpoint. 6 years ago  
Going to church has nothing to do with believing in the big bang. 6 years ago  
God, you intolerant people! Accept other peoples' right to believe what they want! 6 years ago +1
lol you sound like me... 6 years ago +1
As random1234 has pointed out, a simple statement such as Portugal Guest's can easily be restated on the other end. Please elaborate :D 6 years ago +2
Sorry, but it's not yet a fact. Humans are far too young and primitive to understand such sophisticated concepts. 6 years ago  
Since when is Jew an insult? I hope you're not a Neo Nazi... also, (you're*) if you're going to insult someone, do it properly. 6 years ago +2
@guest from newcastle - Science is not 100% provable. If you knew anything about the scientific definition of proof, you would know that it is unattainable. That is the beauty of theories - they can never be proven and thus are maleable and changable over time. 6 years ago  
Neither is provable, only supported. The very definition of proof is a paradox. 6 years ago  
On a side note, I must point out that there is no such thing as proof. You cannot ask for it, and you cannot say you have it. I really enjoy stressing this point. This also goes to those who say there is "proof" of the Big Bang and evolution. There isn't. 6 years ago  
My example is that we see evolution in bacteria on a daily basis. For example, advancements in TB's resistance to drugs. You might say: "That's just bacteria. You don't see evolution in humans, animals, or any multicellular organism for that matter." False. Evolution may be seen in humans. Remember the Bubonic Plague? Classic case of rapid evolution. Those who were resistent to the disease were less likely to get infected by the disease-carrying flea and thus survived to reproduce. Now, may European and Asian populations are naturally resistant to the disease. 6 years ago  
Rude. 6 years ago  
However, there is something wrong with not using condoms and getting an abortion every time you get pregnant. Those who don't practice sex responsibly don't deserve the option. 6 years ago +4
I believe in limited Pro Choice. What does that mean? It means, I believe women should have the right to an abortion once or maybe 2 times a year at most. This way, people aren't using it as a monthly birth control. Situations such as rape and life-threatening conditions don't count. Frankly, there is nothing wrong with an abortion. In fact, the human body naturally has its own abortions where the zygote commits suicide intentionally because of a genetic mismatch if the sperm/egg cell had extra chromosomes or something else that would have led to a disorder in life. However, some situations don't trigger this to happen. For example, Down Syndrome zygotes often dont go through a self-induced abortion. 6 years ago +2
I currently possess a networth of less than $50,000. $25,000 is not going to enable people in desperate need to live a better life. Now, if somehow it would enable every person on the planet to live a life at or above the poverty line, sure. But in this case, no. Life's a game of luck. You either get the opportunities to enrich it or you don't. 6 years ago  
Indeed this is true. 6 years ago  
It can be good gosip too :) 6 years ago  
Call her a b1tch back :P 6 years ago  
You can believe in god and the big bang at the same time :P 6 years ago  
I believe that the dependence on a God for an afterlife is form of coping with the fear of the unknown state of existence, or rather nonexistence, that is death. What happens when I die? Do I just cease to exist? Does that mean "bad" people cease to exist in the same way as "good" people? Does it not matter if you were rich or poor? If you struggled or had everything handed to you? Hmm.... this scares me deeply so I think I'll believe in something that would have infinite wisdom, knowledge, and fairness. God. This way, those who get away on crimes on Earth and aren't properly punished, get punished after death. It's infalliable! Oh, but God might punish me too, so I should worship him and follow his laws to ensure my place in the afterlife as one of the "good" people. - All from fear. That's my opinion at the very least. 6 years ago  
The baby wouldn't go to hell (assuming it exists) because the Bible provides insight on this, that God spares those who are incapable of telling the difference between good and evil, along with those who are mentally not developed enough to accept God. What about all of the abortions, miscarriages, etc... why would God send those innocent lives who have not even transgressed against him yet... to hell? It would make no sense. 6 years ago  
Well... we also don't know that souls exist. We only make the assersion that they do. So too does the Bible make the assersion that children are innocent and "incapable of discerning good from evil." Thus, they would not be able to reject Jesus Christ (for Christianity) or any other religious figure of any other religion. If you're saying that God would have judged the baby based on how it "would have lived," then you're getting into the philosophical ideas of predestination and fatalism (We are destined to perform every action we take, because God has predetermined it and already knows we will make these actions). This takes away Free Will, hence making it impossible for people to make the decision to be "good or evil." Such an issue is very complicated and deserves it's own question on Rrrather. 6 years ago  
hah I answered them from top up, so this was actually only the 2nd time I asked. 6 years ago  
I disagree. 6 years ago  
I don't hold a specific affiliation with the democrats or the republicans. For example, I believe in the right to Abortions, unlike the Republican Party. However, I also support the death penalty, which roughly 80% of Republicans also support. My views are mixed. But this is getting off topic. 6 years ago +1
You are always ready to please your partner and you don't run out of sexual endurance. Or... You can't have sex. 6 years ago +5
Yep! 6 years ago  
impaled in the finger. 6 years ago +5
But humans have the capacity to kill animals painlessly. 6 years ago  
Actually, over 90% of circumcisions in the U.S. are performed on non-Jewish persons. 6 years ago +6
Lol you already said what I didn't want to have anyone say with your comment above. "aids kills only your immune system." This was a question to test the intelligence of the voters. Some didn't know this :P 6 years ago +1
Exactly. You chose the correct answer. 6 years ago +1
Smart 6 years ago  
Birth control wouldn't delete a baby. Instead it would prevent the baby from ever forming. 6 years ago +2
What tim5o said is true. Also, I was talking specifically about physician-assisted suicide. The thing is - some people think this is outright murder because the physicians are indirectly killing the patients. 6 years ago  
Compared to some of your questions, this is Einstein level. 6 years ago +6
I must say....... if you have a perfect face and not a perfect body........... or a perfect body and not a perfect face, it will not look good. It is all about proportions. However, this only applies to when people would actually see your body. Hence, I chose the face. 6 years ago  
Someone's conceited. 6 years ago +3
I'm pretty sure China is a nuclear power. 6 years ago +1
It actually depends on what kind of war is fought. If it is a nuclear war, well... neither because it would result in MAD. If it was a ground war, China because of their numbers. If it was an all out war without nukes, probably Russia because their military is better equipped than China. 6 years ago +1
Hello admin. You bring about an interesting point which has seen much debating. I'll give my input on this matter: What is a year in the bible? It doesn't explicitly state that a year is 365 days and that a day is 24 hours. It could very well be that instead of being "human years," the 6000 years mentioned in the Bible are "God years" which may be much longer than a human-made year according to a calendar. 6 years ago  
Who said anything about listening? 6 years ago  
Oh, you were referring to "in one ear, out the other?" That has a double meaning - the 'hearing and forgetting' meaning and the 'attaining information and discarding it' definition. :P 6 years ago  
But you can still be religious and believe in the big bang... You can be a Buddhist or another religion that doesn't believe in the existence of God. This way you would be both religious and a believer of the Big Bang. 6 years ago  
That's doesn't prove anything. These are just assersions. 6 years ago +1
It cannot be proven one way or the other. 6 years ago  
It cannot be proven one way or the other. 6 years ago +1
Actually, you made a good point. The only thing I could respond to this with is "you're just making yourself look as bad as she did." But that's not necessarily true because you intentionally did it to show how flawed her comment is. So I'll give you that - I didn't take her comment into account as much as I should have. However, I must on a side-note point out that perhaps she is talking about some of those who commented about their religious beliefs. Though that doesn't take any of the rudeness away from her comment... 6 years ago +1
Actually, you made a good point. The only thing I could respond to this with is "you're just making yourself look as bad ash she did." But that's not necessarily true because you intentionally did it to show how flawed her comment is. So I'll give you that - I didn't take her comment into account as much as I should have. However, I must on a side-note point out that perhaps she is talking about some of those who commented about their religious beliefs. Though that doesn't take any of the rudeness away from her comment... 6 years ago  
Well as long as he sells them to a family that is willing to take care of them (similar to adoption), then it's fine. If he sells them as slaves then that's just wrong on so many levels. 6 years ago  
I'd rather use a computer for most of the things an Ipad offers. 6 years ago +5
Too many boys as it is. I oppose China's preference of male children. 6 years ago +8
Idk about Rhinos, but elephants don't have sexual intercourse. 6 years ago  
First thing I thought when I saw option A was Jersey Shore. 6 years ago +15
Agreed. 6 years ago +7
Assuming the ants had the same proportional strength (being able to carry many times their body weight), they would likely win. If nothing else, they would devastate the human population in ways which will never be recoverable. 6 years ago +2
Spend the rest of your time left with your significant other, rather than be too senile to even understand what was going on. 6 years ago +2
As I pointed out in my comment, yes I am racist. And so are you, and every other human being on this planet. Scientific research has provided emperical evidence that the human brain is wired to be racist to varying degrees. See my post on the question "woudl you rather end sexism or racism" 6 years ago +1
And so are you. 6 years ago +1
Now it shows you voted for puppies xD looks like you're getting shot twice! 6 years ago +4
Actually you can press "skip." 6 years ago +1
Once again, I'll repeat myself. Evolutionists, atheists, and those who believe in the Big Bang are NOT THE SAME THING! Not all evolutionists believe in the Big Bang and not all Big Bang believers accept evolution. If you're going to respond to an insulting comment with an equally insulting comment, at least do it properly. 6 years ago  
who said anything about listening? 6 years ago  
I always wanted to know what actually happens if you go there. 6 years ago +18
What's wrong with Snooki getting pregnant...? 6 years ago +1
It's supposed to be "run for a month or walk with leg braces for a month." With your logic, why not just change 5 minutes to 1 second? 6 years ago +5
Use as a storage unit. 6 years ago +12
eyes that blink sideways are fking wierd. 6 years ago +1
More civilians died than military units. Also, if far less destructive weapons like mustard gas are condemned and illegal, of course nuclear weapons should have been condemned and made illegal. 6 years ago +6
If only thousands of people die over the course of 3 years, that's fairly reasonable. 6 years ago +3
I'm sure that thousands of people would die in both scenarios because if there is a financial cricis, people will feel depressed, some might starve, resort to alcohol, etc. and die because of it. The process would be slow though. I'd rather take my chances in a violent revolution. 6 years ago +3
Personally I hate banana so I chose oranges. Then I realized that it was food, not just fruit. However, orange is my 2nd favorite color so it remains. 6 years ago  
The power to have complete control over reality. 6 years ago  
Personally, i think deal or no deal is more fun. 6 years ago +3
Sure it does! If you're gauronteed to win something, you may as well do it in the way that is most fun for you. 6 years ago +2
Ponies don't exist anyway so... :P 6 years ago  
Isn't powerade just a cheap knockoff of Gatorade? 6 years ago +11
i like blu 6 years ago  
Cuddle with girlfriend for warmth ftw 6 years ago +11
Also, if it was an invisibility cloak vs glasses that see through clothes, why would you rather look, when you can walk up and touch? 6 years ago +1
Why would I want to look at peoples' bones? If you mean glasses that let you see through cloths, that's technicaly "selectively-permiable vision" glasses. 6 years ago +1
Another tidbit: What if the baby isn't white? Yes, this is a racist remark, but some people would be more okay with killing a baby that isn't of a certain race. You can call this comment racist if you want, but every human being is to a certain extent racist. When it comes to racism, there is no such thing as innocence - only degrees of guilt. 6 years ago  
If I'm with a girl that I love, ski lift. Cuddle for warmth ftw. If alone, elevator. Screw the cold. 6 years ago +1
If you're poor, and your "true love" is poor, it would have been better to get the $10,000,000. If you're already loaded with money, you don't need more so obviously true love would be the better choice. 6 years ago +2
You took the words right out of my mouth :P 6 years ago  
People who hardcore hate on Justin Beiber are just jealous of his talent because they didn't get to be millionaires before the age of 21. Frankly, if you don't like him, don't listen to him. You don't have to be douchebags. I chose jackson because I actually like some of his songs. Not because I'm a sheep that will be more than happy to jump onto the we-hate-Justin-Beiber bandwagon. 6 years ago +2
he kills people because of his awful voice? Someone's jealous... if he has such an awful voice, why is he world-famous for his music while you're a nobody? Is it because your voice is worse than his? By your logic, yes. In other words, your voice kills people. 6 years ago  
Let me put this little tidbit of information in: What will the baby grow up to be? "A baby has more potential than a dog." This does not necessarily mean good potential. Sure, the baby could grow up to be an Albert Einstein or a Michael Anjelo, or a George Washington. However, that baby has an equal chance of growing up to be an Adolf Hitler, a Joseph Stalin, or a member of Al Quaeda. 6 years ago +1
Random1234, I don't even understand what you're trying to argue with this. The question has nothing to do with eating of animals. You don't kill cows, chickens, and turkeys with your bare hands. Hence you are not the result of their death. So no, you don't kill someone because he ate meat. But what does this answer to your question accomplish in regard to the the baby-or-dogs matter? Nothing. 6 years ago  
So by killing the baby, not only do you save the 100 puppies, you would also save the many animals that the baby would have eaten. 6 years ago +1
Pet dogs account for 31 deaths per year in the U.S. Do you know how many pet dogs die from abusive owners per year? Well into the thousands. 6 years ago  
have you ever seen how many living organisms die per year because of human attacks? 6 years ago  
Which is exactly why I'd rather kill a baby. Even though I don't believe that souls exist, even if they did, the baby would be the obvious choice. 6 years ago  
Neither do humans. 6 years ago  
My sick what? 6 years ago  
Also, if you believe in Heaven and Souls, then it's better to kill someone with a soul than someone without a soul. The reason? I'm not sure exactly how it was worded, but something in Christianity believes that children of a very young age who are killed, go to heaven. If dogs don't have a soul, they only have their life on Earth. By killing the child, you gaurontee it eternal happiness in heaven. By killing the dogs, you deprive them of the one chance to live, since they wouldn't have an afterlife. 6 years ago  
Why do you believe humans have a soul while animals don't? 6 years ago  
Are you Random1234? 6 years ago  
Wait a second.... are you Random1234? 6 years ago  
Also, the human population is well over 6 billion. I'd estimate it at 7 Billion actually. The dog population is far less than this. So compare the two. You're killing the larger choice within a smaller population than a smaller choice within a larger population. 6 years ago  
The difference is that instead of killing one life, you kill 100. 6 years ago  
If you want an overpriced computer with a bunch of apps, Mac. If you want a computer for gaming, good economic value, and access to Flash, PC. 6 years ago +7
Notice by the way, how not a single country with more than 1 vote has a majority for Bush. Says a lot about the world of rrrather users. 6 years ago  
I noticed that a lot of you have said that "both are horrible." Well you know what? If you were put into the position of the President, chances are, everyone would hate you because you would be 10x worse. 6 years ago  
Nope, bush doesn't rule. He already served his 2 terms :P 6 years ago  
Fox is completely biased. 6 years ago  
This is clearly wrong. Your last sentence proved to me the degree of your lack of political and governmental intelligence. And let me tell you sir, that degree is over nine thousand. 6 years ago  
Bush had 8 years to get sh*t done. You're not even giving Obama 4. 6 years ago  
4 trillion dollars over 8 years? lol... 6 years ago  
Actually, every politician since political campaigns began, has lied. Some more than others, but Bush does not have a clear sleight. 6 years ago  
My father makes around $120,000 a year and he pays roughly $25,000 in income tax. 6 years ago +1
Actually, if he was making 150,000k salary, he would likely have paid 30,000,000 in taxes. 6 years ago +1
You must understand that the age level of this website varies from adults to as low as 6 year olds. *I know, because my little brother-in-law often visits Rrrather.* 6 years ago  
Bush didn't? Sure he did. Yet, the recession didn't disappear. 6 years ago  
And... bush didn 6 years ago  
Nope. He hasn't actually created a measureable factor of improvement or destruction. We will find out after his presidency is over. 6 years ago  
Old as hell. Very likely to die during his term. 6 years ago  
Ron Paul reminds me of McCain. 6 years ago  
1. all you conservatives do is blame obama, someone who has not even had 4 years to accomplish his goals, for Bush's terrible record, which was made over a course of 8 years and thus is still affecting society today. Unfortunately, instead of understanding how the flow of presidency works, and that the previous president directly affects the first few years of the next president, you simply choose to blame Obama. 2. He didn't kill OBL, the troops did. I dont see how anyone could argue this, seeing as how no matter which president it was, OBL would have been killed eventually. 3. Just shut up, you're giving intelligent conservatives a bad name. 6 years ago  
That's because Bush's foreign policy is looked down upon by most other countires. 6 years ago +1
Obama has not been the president for 8 years. Name a few good things Bush did. Then tell me what year of his service he did those good things. 6 years ago  
However, even though I said neither, I voted for R.B. instead of J.B. because R.B. as stated in the below comment, does not have nearly as much musical talent. 6 years ago  
Neither. I don't like country music, but I don't go attacking people who made it with hate and statements like "I want to get rid of them." I don't like Beiber's music, I don't like how Rebecca Black uses an autotune, thus no musical talent. They still deserve to exist though... basic human right. 6 years ago  
I'm upset that you can even compare these two. Harry Potter is a legend which will remain a strong presence for decades to come. Like Star Wars. Twilight on the other hand, will fade away. 6 years ago +3
"Limited freedom" and "no freedom" are two completely different things. Complete freedom is Anarchy. Any form of government results in "limited freedom." Hence, the United States gives us limited freedom. If I had an easy life and "limited freedom," I would have the freedom that the U.S. gives us, plus the benefit of an easy life. If I had true, full freedom (Anarchy), I would have a terrible life because everyone would hate me if I acted on the freedom. 6 years ago  
Incorrect. Britain was not nearly as "tyranical" as the U.S. system of social studies makes it out to be. If you actually research the reasons why the Colonists began rebelling (Tea Tax) and how the colonists responded (Boston Tea Party), you will see that we were the real tyrants. The prices of Tea tax was much higher in Britain than in the English colonies. We simply thought that the prices were high because for a long time, Britain completely ignored the colonies, not taxing them at all. Then suddenly, when they decided to open trade and place a tax on tea, we responded by sneaking into their ships, smashing their product, blaming the Indians for the damages, and refusing to pay reparations. Now who did you say was total tyranny? 6 years ago +1
So... Anarchists who feel completely free of any law, are experiencing one of the best feelings 6 years ago +3
I love nightmares. 6 years ago  
I'm surprised that so many voted for option A. In Russia, there is a common belief that you do not truly enter the world until you have opened your eyes, not left the womb. It's considered acceptable, for example, to drown kittens if their eyes have not yet opened. This type of post-birth abortion is considered morally acceptable because the kittens have never experienced the world, so they wouldn't be deprived of something they didn't yet have. 6 years ago  
In other words, you would never have truly lived. 6 years ago +1
You can believe in God and not believe that God created the world. 6 years ago  
If you are going to argue this, at least properly describe the people who lived 2000 years ago which you mentioned. If this were to be true, the people who "tricked" others with religion would have been rich, powerful, and few in number. Your statement suggests that religion was used to control the masses. 6 years ago  
I for one, am rather surprised that someone from Texas chose the Big Bang. 6 years ago +5
Why thank you :) 6 years ago +1
Exactly...? Re-read what I wrote. 6 years ago +1
Those of you who chose 2 random powers... have just acquired the power to shrink your penis as small as you want! 6 years ago +2
I just want to say - PETA is full of hypocritical, radical idiots. 6 years ago +6
PETA needs to die. 6 years ago +1
faaa 6 years ago +5
Hermione! Hey, Hermione! I can produce a very large patronus when I think about you, because the thought of you makes something vast and silver appear from the tip of my wand. And if you touch my scrotum in the right place, I'll expecto my patronum all over your face. 6 years ago +6
Never got into B. 6 years ago  
Easily. You would more than make up for the lost time if you're middle or upper-middle class. You would have to make 1 million dollars a year, or already have a family to choose B. 6 years ago  
Guys in school would ask me for favors, introducing her to them or giving her a good word for them. I'd ask for favors in return. 6 years ago +3
Oh, by the way, let me just say that psychologically speaking, in such a situation, almost 95% of people directly involved would save people by risking their lives. This is a collective existance effect, where every person in danger feels as if they are all together part of a single entity that must be preserved. Many people stayed to help others. Quite a few of those died in the process, but more were saved through their actions than would have been if nobody risked their life to help. Meaning, they accomplished the collective goal of preserving as much life as possible of the combined single entity. Fun stuff, psychology is. 6 years ago +9
Also. Step 1. Marry Hilton Step 2. Acquire the money. Step 3. Divorse. 6 years ago  
Marry =/= sex. 6 years ago  
558 more comments hidden.

Yvpil057 has created the following lists:

  • This user doesn't have any lists.
  •