Would you rather...
yvpil057 (user #1897) Gold MedalGold TrophySuper StarDiamond
Yvpil057 has submitted to following questions to the site:
Yvpil057 has posted the following comments:
- I bet a vegetarian would use this poll in a serious debate.
- Would you rather eat fruit and die of food poisoning or eat a delectabe juicy steak cooked to perfection, after which you gain any superpower you want?+2
- I think its saying that you would have to keep making child pornography in order to get rid of the pedos+1
- If I had the awesome smelling sense of a dog, I'd have to put up with all the sh*tty smells of this world.+9
- The sick freak who doesn't want to get killed, cooked, and fed to orphans.+7
- notice how both the legs are wider than the body.+1
- I would love to go down on someone.+3
- 99% of people who wear makeup and get expencive treatments/stuff to make themselves look more attractive... do it so others think they're beautiful.
- Frankly, there's no point in looking beautiful for yourself.+7
- people call abortions "murder." I'm ok with them though.+4
- Plastic food wrap if I can use regular tp after.+1
- I bet some idiots thought this ment freezing.+3
- What if you could type without spelling errors?+6
- I remember when i was a little kid I liked to watch Hi Hi Puffy Ami Yumi.+3
- If I can cook it, I'd eat that puppy even without the concequence of turning into that thing.+4
- oreo cakesters are disgusting. Seriously they taste terrible.+2
- I'd rather not wake up sore.+4
- amazing+3
- Condom.+2
- Pedo wouldn't touch adults+8
- Bill Compton looks like a pedophile+12
- WOOHOO I KEPT IT 50% 50%
- BLOCKBUSTER SUCKS+2
- Flex them tiny muscles and hold that unsexy bikini.+2
- Is there really a "right" one?+1
- Yeah, since human babies are worthless, even 1 puppy's more valuable
- Who would kill 100 puppies?
- Assuming you're living in the USA and that the baby was born in the USA.
- Depends on age of puppies/baby. If the puppies have never opened their eyes/experienced the world, then the puppies. If the baby is fresh from the womb, the baby.
- Finding true love is easier than finding $10,000,000. You could prepare your life to an appealing state, while hiding the money. That way, you find someone who loves you not for the money. When you show them the $$$ that's just an added bonus.+1
- Note: If you're an Atheist, you risk learning that there really is a god and that you have committed a great sin by denouncing his existence.+8
- Contrary to the belief of most people, scorpions are actually quite edible and even considered delicious by some. All you have to do is cut the tail off and you can eat it raw/alive.+2
- I told the bich I was a pope. Biches love popes.+8
- Neither. Baseball is dumb.
- Same thing?
- I'd want to be the first, so that when I meet hot girls, I can slither in.+1
- zombies don't die of old age
- I'd rather marry a woman.+1
- puffs are for pussies. Crunchy is for c... uhh... the right choice.+1
- wild west can die.
- Well if the land mines are above ground.....
- I'm pretty sure 3 year olds couldn't care less about being healthy.
- So what happens if you get burried under 5 tons of dirt or concrete while in god-mode? :P+4
- I would love to relive the life of every soldier on D-day, but instead of being trapped in their body while they make the decisions of movement, I would be in control. Every time I died, I would immediately be placed into the next soldier, from before we reach the beach. Afterwards, I would return to being me. I just want to see how different the battle would be if every soldier had the same mentality and a complete mental connection to one another.
- I don't really care if they will never love me back. Just having them there is enough for me. I wouldn't want to spend my life with someone who I don't love, even if they love me.
- I'd rather be a little over weight than anorexic, and a little underweight than obese.
- Not if there are more curves on her stomach than there are curves on an average woman's entire body.
- Oops. I ment to put that on the comment below.
- Whispers in the dark.
- What if you're already in a life of wealth? 2nd choice should have said "life of lower-class or poverty"
- Honey Badger will rip your face off+6
- People are afraid that you would get shot or something. (you can still die with no return) scares people.
- What if you're unattractive, both physically and mentally?+12
- If the 2nd option was "Not do it with your sister," my choice wouldn't change.+7
- dip spit = the chew tobacco you spit out.
- I would rape the Xmas critters. All of them.+9
- snot wouldn't take as long. Aside from that, this is just nasty.+5
- Depends. Is the family member hot?+2
- Yeah, I'd choose the first option even if there was nothing bad in t he 2nd one.
- Mountain Dew classic.+1
- starving people don't need to be saved.+1
- walking backwards looks badass.+2
- I rarely leave my home as it is.+3
- I would rather choose option C
- I think i'd rather be paralysed or severely hurt and survive than die drowning. Drowning does hurt. It's very uncomfortable and slow because you're suffocating, whereas if you die from the jump, its more immediate.
- sonic is gay+2
- yeah :/ i like freezing my hands sometimes
- change ejaculate to orgasm so that both genders can answer.+4
- Yeah, human race isn
- Yeah, human race is really corrupt and probably isn't worth saving.+4
- I hate seafood.+7
- Don't have to orgasm to feel good.+5
- I would rape bigfoot. Just give me the chance.
- At least with Beiber, you don't have to listen to 100% autotune.+2
- Not being able to make new memories is literally the same as being dead. You've lost your ability to experience human life.+2
- spiders are delicious bro
- I ...
- I would use my super powers to acquire wealth and then procure 20 BOSS cars worth a total of 31mill.+3
- Question implies that you would become young again. Who wouldn't want that?+1
- Nothing offends me. If you do something to offend me, I probably have the legal right to kill you.
- my sister's hot... so not only would I marry her...+1
- "red sauce" .... wouldn't it be easier just to say Ketchup?+8
- Spiders are delicious.+1
- Pictures unrelated.
- the whole point of reading minds is to be able to know how to persuade someone to do something you want them to do... if you had the power of persuasion you would become a god with human lifespan.+2
- I would invent magic.+5
- I would try to find out what made Hitler tick.
- Kennedy died for a reason. You don't shoot a president 5 times in public and get away with it.+1
- doesn't say anything about touching/seeing the penis....
- Now if only women in real life didn't feel entitled to a handsome and nice guy....
- Control
- 1% of the population has 99% of the ugly look.
- Occupy butterfaces.+1
- I love your responses... and your picture is awesome too.
- Lois is hot. SO MANY EPISODES with Dat Ass.+7
- Booyya 50/0
- Loaded picture.
- elephant testicles are the same as the skin anywhere on its body. If you disinfect it, its not as gross as you think. At least not as gross as being violated by a monkey for 30 minutes.+2
- Stop making double posts. I know they're accidental but stop! :P
- lose my feet because prostetics are much more complicated when it comes to arms/hands.+2
- Oh, if you change it to hydrochloric acid, then I'd rather snort the glass. Hydrochloric acid would kill you after sending pain through all of your veins.+1
- Show the cats some love man :(+5
- Quit taking ideas of how to torture Jews from this website!
- Not gay so.....+4
- I don't worship. I have better things to do in my short lifespan than to devote myself to Jesus or god.+7
- The one that's a woman.
- Hooker - STD's. Stripper - can be a virgin.+6
- Bush has old wrinkly, hairy balls.+1
- Obama has big black balls.
- I can wash my legs/feet but not my lungs.+6
- Hot cousin = nice.
- The main reason people take showers is to not stink... It's not a matter of personal hygene but rather to make other people not want to run from you+1
- can it be my sh*t and can it be completely solid? :P
- So... why do we keep terminally ill, braindead people alive on machines? Unplug those machines.+2
- Depends entirely on what person it is. If the animal is a siberian husky and the person is a member of Al Qaeda or Rebecka Black.... I would probably save the husky.+7
- Change mom to sister...
- The reason I like pizza is because of its thin layer of pita bread. Never had Chicago style pizza, but I know I wouldn't like it. I don't like pizza sauce much either.+1
- Both are disgusting, but Spaghetti has meat as opposed to plain pasta.
- You don't get a lot of pressure from the authorities in Mexico because you practically ARE the authority.+4
- Guy on the right looks deformed+2
- Dark chocolate is much healthier and actually good for your brain. White chocolate tastes better imo.
- That's not true. Artificial insemination is an alternative to sex. Also, inb4 test tube baby.+1
- Wrong. You can reproduce without sex.
- Global warming is a fact....
- I can sell my wishes to billionaires...
- cheated on? Doesn't matter. Had sex.+1
- hot chicks vs sweaty manly chicks...+1
- Or none.+2
- Can I have both?
- No. They would gang up on you if you tried to eat them. Then, they would eat you.
- You could go down in history as one of the great people who led up to the invention of a great thing.
- well... idc if my friends hate her. They won't hate me.
- What if she got raped by me?:+1
- fu ck the winner
- The pictures are biased. If you're going to show an extremely skinny person, you should show an extremely fat person too :P+1
- I never saw avatar so I'd rather watch avatar
- white+1
- The whiter the hotter.+1
- I'd have sex with other kids and will be immune to jail :/+3
- take advantage of the low self esteem. Get her to let you bang her any way you want while working to improve her self esteem at the same time
- Abortion vs chemotherapy. Abortion leaves a scar. Chemo makes you lose your hair and probably shortens your life.
- Nothing wrong with giving birth at 16 either. Hundreds of years ago and further back, it was common for girls between age 12-18 to give birth :/
- not gay so... no.
- I don't find homosexuals in the least bit bad.
- Well... I would live longer than she so obviously...
- dip your finger =/= lose your finger.
- i can shave it all off.
- Btw ugly duckface is ugly
- you can survive lightning
- "It is better to let 1000 criminals free than to imprison 1 innocent person"
- The whole point of a one night stand is so you DON'T KNOW THE PERSON....+3
- I'd rather have skinny than curvy. I'd rather have something in the middle than curvy or skinny. Skinny does not have to mean annorexic.
- So... while the individual vote is more for god, notice how 17 of the 20 countries here have a majority in the big bang. A rather large one at that.+9
- God is likely nothing more than a belief. Onset by our own minds, god is real but he is not all-powerful. Rather, he is just a part of our brain. So in a way, the Eastern belief that god is everything and everyone is true.+7
- Look up the God Helmet on wikipedia for more information on how god is just in our mind. htt p:/ /en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/God_helmet+7
- God is only in our mind. Look up the God Helmet.+9
- god did not do it+12
- And yet you voted instead of skipping.
- The results of this pole were unexpected by me... I assumed that people liked more revealing undergarments+2
- Who would want to date justin beiber? Your date would get ruined by paparazzi every time.+1
- Immortal because some day eventually, mankind will triumph in space exploration and colonization. Our planet is doomed to be consumed by the sun. However, mankind will be long gone before that ever happens. We will likely travel to the Sirius system, as there have already been found plants with similar conditions to those of Earth. Space-built bio domes are also possible. I don't care if I outlive my loved ones. I'm not the type of person who laments death.+1
- Uhh...+1
- First of all, the STD doesn't matter because you're on a date, not a one night stand. You're not fuc king them. Secondly, I'm still 16 and I know some pretty da mn hot 13 year olds.+3
- Neither. Don't mess with history. Bad sh*t happens.+8
- No creationism
- I've done it with the rough part as a dare before. It's not nearly as bad as people hype it up to be.+9
- Dry ice would harm your eyes more than most acids would burn your toes. Unless you're using Aqua Regia or a superconcentrated hydrochloric acid, it wouldn't be as bad.+1
- Haunted does not necessarily mean physically harmed. They could try to scare me but not actually do anything physical to me. So I would taunt them and slap them even though my hand would go through them like a ghost :/
- Heaven doesn't exist, but this question implies that it would exist for you (and only you). I would go with heaven because there's no way to get in without a ridiculous question like this that gaurontees the hypothetical situation.+1
- How would you know how much it hurts if you haven't experienced either? A guy proved that you're still alive 6-12 seconds after your head gets chopped off. That means you feel the pain of having your neck severed. You don't choke to death on hanging, you get your neck snapped and die.
- I would only eat sicilian pizza if it was custom made for me to have 2x the cheese and half the tomato sauce.
- You are from Texas. Hence, your argument is made invalid.+38
- Who created god then?+25
- Actually, most countries have voted for big bang.+14
- I've actually had fantacies of being able to inhabit the body of everyone sentenced to death at a nazi labor camp or death camp. I would rebel against the Nazi soldiers in each case, with the next body I inhabit existing in the same time, while the previous body carries out my previous actions on its own this time. Eventually, we would kill at least a few Nazis. Since most of us would have died anyway, why not?
- Lots of people are being panzies who can't accept the fact that they'd rather, in a real life situation, choose B. Why do you think half of the American population doesn't have an adopted starving african child? It's because they cost money. Be moral if you want but that is a cold hard fact. If you only make enough money to provide for yourself and/or wife/family, you'd much rather have an abortion than adopt and have to provide for 3 more mouths. It says you would make their lives fun and enjoyable. Did any of you consider that it would be to the cost of your personal health, fun, and enjoyment? What if the only way to make their lives fun and enjoyable was at the direct sacrifice of your 3 natural children who will now starve and lose all the fun and enjoyment in their life? An abortion is nothing.
- Obviously the baby. The world is already overpopulated with humans. I also have no empathy for death. However, the main reason I chose the baby over the 100 cubs is ... it would take a LONG A$S TIME to murder with your bare hands, 100 animals. Most people would probably want to kill themselves after murdering one animal. Oh and humans are animals as well. The tigers might not be sentient, but they are entitled to life just as much as we are.+6
- I don't want an ugly girl... that whole " the personality is all that matters" idea is a bunch of bullsh*t made by people who've never been in a relationship with an a$s-ugly girl.
- I would just murder criminals who deserve to die.+13
- it is 100% proven that you have no proof of god's existence.+2
- The theory states that the matter wasn't created or destroyed. Rather it was in the form of a supercondenced mass of energy which, with the big bang, was converted into matter. Matter can be created from pure energy and pure energy from matter. The whole e = mc^2 formual is interchangeable and can be m = e/c^2+1
- There are 152 countries currently here.
- If we only count the countries with over 50 votes on them, there are 43 countries. Out of these 43, only 3 have a majority of votes for god.+2
- i chose the girl over the yoshi.
- Failure to understand "to the face."+3
- The only problem is that same-sex marriage is illegal in many countries and many states in the U.S.
- Criminals deserve to die more than innocent family members.+2
- Whoever voted for option B is retarded. WoW is an awesome game. That being said, even if it was a terrible game, who would rather kill themselves than play the terrible game for a few hours/minutes and then QUIT? You can't quit death after you die.+1
- Uhh... there's a reason we have the abiliity to feel pain. It's essencial to our survival. If someone stabs you from behind, you will bleed to death not ever knowing what's wrong. You'll just think someone bumped into you or something.+5
- Furries are hot.+2
- Every person who voted for "felch your grandma" should look up the definition of felch.+10
- Obvious? You can easily learn to skateboard. You can't easily become the world's best at something. You could be put in the Guiness Book of World Records for world's best skateboard gamer.
- If you do your service outside of wartime, your risk of death is significantly reduced compared to being a new recruit being drafted immediately into the combat zone.+6
- Because Americans are the only ones who believe in creationism...+4
- Atheism is not a religion. Atheism is the lack of a religion. That's like saying that being bald is a haircut. It's not.+4
- The fact that you have no evidence of who wrote it. Your belief does not count as evidence.+2
- If he wasn't just a normal man, that doesn't mean he had to be the son of God.
- Jesus was an alien.+1
- And how many presidents in the past have we had that also violated the Constitution of the USA? Many. Also, the reason Obama talks to the people on the level of an American Middle-Schooler is because most American adults are about as intelligent as an American Middle-Schooler and wouldn't understand complicated intellectual debates.
- You should also note that it is unwise to act intellectual when running for President. Just look at George W. Bush v.s. Al Gore. Al Gore was by far supperior in intelligence, however, the public became scared of his intellect because he made many people feel stupid when they couldn't understand the "big words" that he said. So they voted for the stupid guy.
- rrrather hasn't gotten that big yet+6
- obviously the first one.
- If you chose the second one, you would be forever alone.+1
- People overreact.+2
- I'm offended at how inflated the twilight vote is.+5
- Kill all babies.+3
- A ment Yes, B ment no.
- Look them up on youtube.
- I assume rats carry more diseases than chimpanzees.+5
- Monarchs tend to be abusive.+2
- Girls, pretend the question talks of a guy+5
- Women should address this question as "Leg or genitals"
- Loophole: even without vocal cords/hands, you could still type with your feet on a computer keyboard or similar device, granted it would be slow. But I don't use the B.S. loopholes that people use to justify their choices. So instead, I picked B+4
- Law Abiding Citizen was one of the best movies I've ever watched.
- Somehow, in a real life and death situation, I doubt this.
- I highly doubt it.
- Who said it had to be YOUR baby?
- It shows clearly on the right that you voted for the puppies.
- Wrong. You chose puppies.
- Judging by how you value 100 lives over billions of lives just because the 100 are of your species, you're the douchebag.+2
- Yes.+1
- People die way more often in family guy.
- I'd resurrect jesus only because justin beiber doesn't deserve to die for no reason. I could also ask jesus about god and then do psychological tests to verify if he's crazy or just making things up.
- If it's one of the girls I love, sexy.+2
- Not true. You feel all the pain of burning when you freeze. The difference is, once your nerves freeze, you stop feeling it because they're frozen. Once you stop feeling pain from burning is likely because you're dead.
- Front part.+1
- Working as intended.
- Since you take the time to give lengthy, well thought-out and sometimes humorous responses, I've decided to respond in kind. First allow me to point out my reasoning for choice A. Eventually, in X amount of years, the star we know as the Sun will expand into a red giant, consuming the planets Mercury through Earth (and possibly Mars). If only non-sentient organisms would exist on Earth, they would be wiped out despite choice B allowing them to live on. Humans on the other hand, and this is speculation/predictions, will eventually colonize the outer planets though the construction of biodomes and similar technologically advanced constructions. We might even venture out into other solar systems and beyond. If human kind survives the test of time, we would remain as a representation of the legacy that our ancestors left us with. We would represent the sentient life of the once-existent planet Earth. My take on evolution, is that the whole point of evolving is to achieve a stage where space and time no longer circumscribe the lives of orgnisms or their species as a whole.+1
- Pardon any spelling errors, I typed this at 2 A.M.
- Kill stalin = save 20 million people = change time = inadvertantly kill billions who would have been born without your killing of Stalin but are now nonexistent because of time-change paradoxes and complications. Problem?+6
- I prefer "French Fries," not British chips. Crisps sounds wrong to me.+5
- Wear a hat or abnormally large glasses. If the gender you're attracted to you rejects you because of lack of eyebrows, they can go fk themselves and are worthless.+1
- Somehow I doubt this.+2
- "Have sex all I want
- oops. Ment to say "Have sex all I want" does not mean "Get to have sex with anyone, any time I want." People would just reject me.
- gigglepies freak the sh*t out of me.+3
- There's a dragonball movie?+1
- Anime is not ment to be made into real-life actor movies. Never. Ever.+4
- Don't. Say. Anything.+1
- If I was rich, I would already have plenty of equipment at my disposal such as a reliable vehicle (be it car or helicopter). Since I collect weapons as it is, I would have even more expencive and exotic ones if I was rich. This would provide me with weapons to combat the zombies. I would also have a mansion which I could fortify and provide shelter for those I value/love. Every survivor I provide shelter for (mostly attractive females or males that are experts in certain fields) would look up to me as a savior and protector. OR I could look really stupid forever. Difficult choice.+2
- Communism IS good for everybody.... I find it hilarious how people are brainwashed into thinking that Communism is the work of the devil... if you actually read Marx's ideas of communism, it is the most perfect ideology possible. The only problem is that the true form of Communism has never existed and most likely never will. Allow me to elaborate - Marx's Communism primarily stated that Communism would take place in industralized nations. However, up to date, only agrarian nations such as China, the USSR (which later became industrialized but dropped communism), and a few more Asian countries.
- I am a supporter of the true form of communism, which is, Utopia. Literally, this makes the true form of communism the most perfect system possible to achieve. Any other system would have impoverished, homeless, starving, or otherwise suffering members.+1
- What if God created the Big Bang? Then the Big Bang still created the world.+2
- Don't group the smart US citizens with the ignorant ones.+3
- Its funny how you think that the existence of God can be proven. Its also funny that you think the Big Bang can be proven. In science, tnothing can be proven. Nothing.+1
- Actually, God's existence is a theory too.+1
- You also aparently don't understand the definition of theory. A theory is a combination of many thousands of hypotheses which were found to be supported by data and analysis, which then became widely accepted. God is a theory. The Big Bang is a theory. Neither one of them is defined as fact.+2
- Well why don't you read up on all of the evidence that contradicts some of the things in the Bible? God did not always exist. The infinite existence of a sentient entity in itself is illogical. Basically, you don't know how the universe began. Neither do I. You however, go with the mentality that "If we can't explain it, god did it." That was the same in the past, when people thought that rain was God's tears and lightning was God's spears. Your example of evidence is self-serving bias at best. You're just making arguments based on semantics, not logic or science. I don't call it fact by the way, I call it theory. Just as God is a theory.+1
- The bible is just a book made by people. Who is to say that a cult of crazies didn't start this many thousands of years ago? I know, I'm making a stupid argument with this comment, but it's no stupider than yours. "God always existed, always will" - The Bible did not always exist. God didn't just hand a book to people and tell them this was how everything came to be. Humans wrote that book. It's time to learn that humans are capable of lying for personal gain.+1
- You don't get us evidence of God. You get us semantics. The fact that you just disagreed with evolution proves that you have been brainwashed by religion beyond help. Saying evolution is BS anyways is exactly the same as saying God is BS anyways. It's weird how you even came up with the idea of god! Here's a question for you, since it has been supported countless times that bacteria is capable of evolution, then why are there both archaic and modern forms of bacteria in existence?+1
- To answer your question: Apes didn't have a choice in their evolution. It's not like you can just say "hey, lets all evolve!" Do you know why there are over 7 billion people on this planet, and not over 7 billion apes? It's because human evolution resulted from favorable reproductive circumstances. I'll give you a modern-day example. Down's syndrome. Lets think of Down's syndrome children as the "apes" and regular humans as that which evolved from apes. You asked why both apes and humans still exist today, if it was supposedly advantagious for apes to evolve [if they somehow theoretically could]. So then why do both healthy humans and Down's syndrome humans still exist? Down's syndrome people are clearly disadvantaged when it comes to reproduction, mental capability, physical capability, etc. Yet, they can still reproduce with other humans and have Down's syndrome children. What does this mean? Just because you are disadvantaged in reproduction when compared to other, similar organisms, doesn't mean you can't reproduce and will die out.
- What's even more funny is that you're a hypocrit, even though you like to call others hypocrits. You attack Big Bang voters for telling you to look up a video or article. Yet you yourself tell us to look in the Bible. Quote: "Go read the Bible or some of the other Christian comments and you will have your evidence of God." Guess what? I haven't seen you include a single specific excerpt/quote from the Bible to support your argument. You have provided no proof yourself (even though proof cannot be provided by anyone for anything).
- You don't want to take the time to watch a video or read an article or go to a website because you already believe that it's a load of junk and what you believe is correct. Looking through these videos/articles would be a waste of time. Well guess what? Many of those who voted for the Big Bang aren't much different than you. They are firm in their beliefs and don't want to waste their time reading the Bible because they believe that it is a load of junk. Your opinion is different but your attitude is a mirror image. Good game sir.+1
- From the past 100 or so comments that I've read, I have concluded that "random1234" is completely one-sided on this topic and will refuse to yield to the opposite side. He will also refuse to reach a compromise. I challenge you sir, to look at what you have posted and see for yourself how incredibly self-oriented your comments are. I try to consider the opposite side with respect and with the attitude that they may be right. You however, deserve no such respect because you approach the topic as "the voters for B are ALL WRONG, only I [and other voters for A] am right."+6
- You still die.
- What you don't understand is that the economic impact of the previous president carries over into the next. What you saw in 2008 was not Bush, but rather Clinton. Right now we're feeling the results of having Bush. We have not seen the economic impact of Obama's presidency yet because it hasn't even been 4 years. One man can't make a difference in trillions of dollars in under 4 years.
- I'll ask a similar question. Would you rather believe in god and spend your entire life as a nun or priest living secluded from civilization, only to have wasted your life when there turns out not to be a god? Or would you rather be an atheist, live a happy, fulfilling life, and then find out there is a God who favors those who are honest about their beliefs, not what they believe?+1
- This proves you have no idea what communism is. Communism is where everyone works as much as they physically can and earn the same (meaning, if you have no legs, you don't have to work as long as a healthy person). You're only right on the incentive part. You're wrong about the government. In Communism, there is no government. None.
- I honestly can't tell if you're this ignorant, or if you're just a troll. The "Utopia" mentioned before is actually the communism which Marx advocated. This form has never existed in its true form. China isn't that Utopian communism.
- Whoever made this question doesn't know what Communism is.+4
- gg
- I voted for B to deny you the satisfaction of appearing under the "Biggest difference in votes" section.+1
- The most interesting man in the world is Chuck Norris who came back from the future because he felt like it.+16
- I wonder what you voted....+2
- I used to tell "arrow to the knee" jokes. Then I took a pussy to the dick.+5
- The government shouldn't be able to do anything against the church unless the church directly violates the law. In my opinion, the church should not be allowed to do anything against the government as well.+1
- Protests and such things are okay, but nothing radical.
- For those that don't know, the Death Note is a book in which you can write the name of someone and they are then gauronteed to die.
- Most people don't take their headphones out of the house. If nobody can see them, who cares what they look like?+3
- I like both.+1
- Spell check.
- LBJ was one of the worst presidents in the U.S. popularity wise.+2
- The point of this website is to not skip any questions, even if both are nasty or if both are difficult to choose.+2
- You will go to hell.+2
- Ancient Egyptians and chariots at the bottom of the Red Sea doesn't "Prove" anything. It only supports what the Bible says, but it 'proves' nothing. Since we don't know exactly how they got there from first-hand experience, we don't know for a fact whether this truly serves as unrefutable evidence for the Bible's validity. For example, the Egyptians could have simply attempted to cross the Red Sea for economic purposes. What about burial at sea? Just because we know there are remnants of the Ancient Egyptians in the Red Sea does not serve as "proof" for the Red Sea Crossing written in the Bible.+2
- The penis.+4
- Doesn't matter. Had sex.+5
- Penis can be re-attached. Arms/Legs would likely lose some manipulative ability.+2
- A Truckstop.+5
- I can't believe how ignorant you are.+2
- In all honesty, I hate mustard.+2
- It's better to make one person suffer than to have many people suffer... and die.
- I can still masturbate next to the girl. I also don't consider hand/headjobs "sex."+2
- Why??? You could fill both of her holes at the same time!+1
- Oops. Now that I think about it... wrong choice.+4
- Whoops. I thought the second said "Love someone who loves you but likes collecting teeth"+14
- London girls are way more attractive.
- Nicolas Cage could just be made into a minor character like "Gaurd 1"+2
- Despite being closer to the sun, Mercury is actually not as hot as Venus.+2
- It's not a person. It's ash. I don't understand why people think that just because it was made from a human, it continues to be a human. If this were true, then all of the vegans/vegetarians would have a hard time accepting that the plants they're eating actually were once parts of animals.+1
- Jackie Chan to me seems more stunt than actual brute force+1
- Unlimited supply of prostitutes = exploit them for money as a pimp. Unlimited supply of ganja - Could get thrown in jail for it.
- The American legal system is a joke. I can be a pimp and with just 1 item, people wouldn't be able to throw me in jail for receiving services from prostitutes or for having them work for me. It's a very simple device. A camera. By having a camera, I can hire as many prostitutes as I want right in front of the cops. I'd just tell them that I'm making a porno. Now the girl is an actor, not a "prostitute."+1
- Clearly you're not the smartest though.+5
- "allot" - to give someone a part or share of something.
- It's true. You would be the richest person ever... for maybe a day. Many people wouldn't be able to control themselves, and would go on a spending spree, wasting their money. They could also be robbed/killed/blackmailed to give away their money. To be the richest person ever, you just have to have $1 more than the current richest person. If you were the smartest person ever, you would be smart enough to create/invent things that would make you even more money than option A.+2
- I haven't had either before...+3
- Do you drink? If you do, you're doing something that hurts you more than marijuana.+4
- Never heard of Moams before.+9
- I really hate mustard.+1
- I've probably eaten 50
- Pretend pecker means genitals in general.
- A lion-sized rabbit would bite you in half.. and then have sex with your entrails.+2
- Infinitely better, more choices too.
- I never thought I'd agree with you on something on rrrather.com :/ But I do. However, I would like to point out that not only did they "deceive and woo" the public, but they also used terror, extortion, and blackmail. The S.S. used these tactics to eliminate any political opposition.+1
- I'd like to point something interesting out - If you aren't held responsible for the actions of your ancestors, then why do some minorities get benefits over whites due to the actions of whites in the past? Some black people today, for example, justify crimes as "carrying out justice against the white men who oppressed them in the past?" There probably aren't a lot of people who view things this way, but they exist. I say forgive and forget. I had no say on what people did over 50 years ago. I shouldn't be held responsible for their actions.+3
- Global warming is factual, and backed by hard evidence from multiple studies. For example, scientists have extracted samples of ice from Antarctica as well as Alaska/Canada and found that CO2 levels from over 100 years ago showed steady and repetative drops and rises. Had this been all they found, it would have served as evidence against global warming. However, at around the 1920s (6 years after the assembly line was invented, allowing cars to be mass-produced cheaply), the levels started rising more than was found before this time period. The growth continued even more, though drops also happened. Yet, the drops were to a lesser extent as compared to those from over 100 years ago. In the past 30 years they found that the levels were over 3 times higher in the ice than those of 100 years ago. Frankly, saying that only "wacko evironmentalists" believe in global warming is to say "only wacko religious people believe in god."+1
- Uhh... mkay so they show an average woman on the left and a freak on the right... wonder who will get chosen... so difficult.+1
- "The best sexy ever"+3
- Best player on worst team - you're still a terrible player, just better than the terribad teammates you have.+2
- I dont talk about him as it is.+8
- Dat ass.+6
- The person I love is the person who wrote this question - using numbers instead of words and using all caps.+4
- People say that the Mayans predicted the end of the world in 2012 because that's when their giant stone calendar ends. Those idiots probably never stopped to think that maybe, just MAYBE, the Mayans simply ran out of room on the stone.+7
- People still use bing?+5
- Since when can only guys be gay?+9
- You can't always trust what you read.+5
- Actually, none of us will.+2
- nothing.+1
- Then why did you vote creation? Creation and evolution are two separate things. You can believe in both god and evolution. You can even believe in creation and no god (though this one is wierd). The question is asking if you believe in Evolution (that we evolved) or Creationism (That God set us down instantly the way we are).+1
- lalalee is correct. If you were to scroll down the comments and read my input, it says basically the same thing. You can't expect a president to immediately improve the country right after they're elected. The president is not an almighty entity capable of making any decision and be able to enforce it.
- Big Bang duhhhh u idiots+2
- duh+2
- Big Bang did make the world so you peps are rong+5
- I'm going to give a response to every unintelligent comment for those who voted for God, with an equally unintelligent comment.+1
- Because only Americans believe in God creating the world. Because ALL Americans don't believe in the Big Bang. Right?+3
- Not according to the old testiment.+4
- Then you should have chosen the Big Bang.
- I'll just play with her body while watching them.+6
- If God created the Big Bang, then you voted incorrectly. This isn't asking if you believe in God or not.
- Most of the people who chose God are capable of thinking for themselves. Just because you believe in God, doesn't mean all of your actions will be dictated by God.+2
- What if neither of them created the universe, and we are too primitive and incapable of understanding such sophisticated and complicated processes as those which reacted our Universe?+2
- It's actually a lot harder to find $10,000,000 than true love. Unless you're rich, that is.
- I'm honestly surprised at now many people voted Twilight. Harry Potter was in every way better.+1
- I like them both. However, I like Pepsi more because it appears more fizzy to me.+1
- ugly and skinny all the way. Put a trashbag on them and you're good to go.
- One of the main reasons why atheists are atheists is because they ask the same question. "How could you get something out of nothing?+2
- So is creation. Creation is just a theory, and it only still exists as a theory because some religious people still believe in it. While creation has evidence in the Bible and other such religious works, evolution has significantly more evidence. In my opinion though, evolution is a theory. Creation is a belief. A theory has more credibility than a belief.+5
- Deism and theism are two different words. He didn't misspell it. You're dumb.+2
- Wrong. It's not a history bood and was never intended to be one.
- This just proved to me that you lack a proper education. Deism is not Theism. Deism is the belief in the existence of a supreme being, specifically of a creator who does not intervene in the universe. Theism is the belief in the existence of a god or gods, esp. belief in one god as creator of the universe, intervening in it and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures. See the difference?+2
- We are by far not the most intellectually powerful as a population. Sure, we have some of the smartest people in the world, but so do many other countries. If you combine all of the intelligence of the United States and divide it by the population, it would be significantly lower than many other countries.+1
- This. This is exactly what I'm trying to say.
- "Blessed is the mind too small for doubt." - Warhammer 40,000
- Yes, because instead of just saying "God did it," we actually explore it further.
- As does religion. What church doesn't ask for alms, or "10% of your wages" to be given as a tribute?
- I wonder now if "Adam" is symbolic of "Atom"+1
- Although I agree that Texas is taking it's religious beliefs to an extreme, I must point out that they are not trying to protest evolution being taught in public schools. Instead, they protest to gain the ability to provide counter-claims for evolution that support creation. This is just what I learned in school, so it may not be fully correct.
- This. This. Oh my god, this.+2
- From what I understand, a hypothesis becomes a theory when there is sufficient evidence and when a sufficient number of people agree with it/support it. By that definition, creationism would qualify, would it not?
- Evolution isn't science. Science was used to discover and understand evolution, but evolution in itself is not "science." Unless you believe that something with scientific applications is science, because that would make anything and everything science.
- Actually, you can see evolution in a zoo. However, it is evolution through artificial selection rather than natural selection. This is the result of zookeepers selectively breeding certain individual animals for desirable offspring. An example of this is zookeepers breeding the most healthy female lion with the most visually attractive mane. This way, the offspring are more likely to be appealing to visitors, thus serving the zoo. Whereas ugly lions who are sickly and unattractive would not be allowed to mate..
- You must understand though, that some people are taught from a very early age to blindly believe in the religious views of the family. Something so powerfully conditioned into the mind of a little child and then maintained throughout childhood would be very difficult to give up. People like this are made to see religion as fact and anything else as "ignorance." It's not their fault really, but that of the parents.+4
- Just to clarify your first sentence, I believe the question was not intended to make us fight. Rather, it was asked to get the opinions of people but unintentionally fostered negativity and outright violence and rudeness. However, it is in human nature to act aggressively to defend your property, and beliefs can be considered property (though not materialistic). Also, there are a lot of idiots in the world (both those who voted for option A and those who voted for option B). Also, I as an indiviudal find debating this topic and those similar to it to be very fun and entertaining. It's sort of brain candy. However, I try to limit my "attacking" arguments to indivuduals who display a complete disregard for tolerance of the other viewpoint. A prime example is user Random1234.+9
- I ask that from this point on, we make legitimate arguments that don’t outright insult the other viewpoint. No uncivilized posts from option A voters like “Only stupid asses would vote for big bang theory” or posts from option B voters like “wtf :D:D:D stupid americans :D:D:D dont know whats more funny. comments or reality, that 60% of you believe in this :D.” Such posts only hurt the side you’re voting for because it makes you look like... well frankly, like an asshole. At least be to a minimal degree considerate of others. I myself am guilty of such posts, but I will try my best not to do this again. Let us all not upvote such posts.+5
- Here's a thing to think about: Immortality does not mean indestructibility. If you get a cut, you don't die from it so you're still technically immortal. what if your arm gets ripped off? What happens if your head gets ripped off? You
- You would still be immortal, but now you would be just a head, incapable of speaking because your voice box was ripped off. Now how can you make money? Can you even be happy? Would you not wish to die every second of your life? Even if this doesn't happen, eventually the Earth will be consumed by our Sun becoming a Red Giant. Hope you enjoy being slowly burned alive, literally experiencing Hell.
- I would still vote for immortality though, because then I would have all the time in the world to enjoy my life, and put my bet on humanity that they would discover a method of leaving the Earth and eventually reaching another planet that is hospitable for humans, in a safe way.+2
- I ask of you to make this comment (THIS ONE RIGHT HERE) to be the separation line in recognition of the post below it.
- Monkey D. Luffy.+3
- I like how you used "you're" correctly the first time but not the second.+2
- This sends out the message that you only did so because you're afraid that God will punish you if you don't. Isn't there something about how on Judgement day, those who will say they believe in God only out of fear, will not be spared, and only those who have truly and genuinely believed will be saved? (I myself don't know. Could someone clarify?)+2
- Can it not be said that the phenomenon of the Big Bang always was, is, and will be? It always was, because it was the origin of time and space. It is, because the event is still going on. (Universe is expanding as a result of the explosion). It always will be because the universe will continue to expand from it.+2
- Then perhaps I misinterpreted some of your posts as "utterly rejecting the other viewpoint." I'll give you an example: guest from Massachusetts, United States wrote 1 week ago: Is it that far fetched to think maybe god created the world and a few species, which then evolved into humans? random1234 from Florida, United States wrote 1 week ago: yes, because in Genesis, it says all animals were created on one day, and man on another. - That looked to me like you were not willing to tolerate the possibility of Genesis not being 100% correct for verbatum. Perhaps I simply misinterpreted it.+2
- No... I'm pretty sure that his or her parents did. Not God.
- It can be said though that the Multiverse always was, is, and will be. Currently, scientists studying the Big Bang are trying to confirm that more than one has occurred. Through this, the multiverse would continue it's infinite path by having more and more individual universes created within it through individual Big Bangs. If this should ever be confirmed (And by no means am I saying that it WILL), then it may be said that neither the Big Bang nor God is the origin of everything, but rather it is the Multiverse.+1
- BTW I haven't researched this much beyond that which I learned through public education and personal research. I would have to explore the subject more before I can actually say that I believe in it. (I don't believe in the Multiverse yet.)+1
- Actually, both have reason behind them.+1
- This is a difficult choice which I believe you must come to through your own experiences and trials of life.
- It doesn't have to be perfect for God to exist. Humans are by no means perfect.
- Prim is beautiful in this picture.
- Calm Down.
- Kinda obvious.+11
- In your mind. They do.
- Actually it makes perfect sense. God exists 100%. In the mind of that person if not in reality.
- Refuted by one of the comments. Sorry KutWrite, but you have made a few mistakes there - The greenhouse effect is a little bit of a misnomer - CO2 does not make a physical barrier, like a garden greenhouse, but retains heat at the earth's surface. It does not need to rise high into the atmosphere. Currently, the ocean is a net sink for CO2 - it absorbs much more than it releases. This is slowly acidifying the oceans and changing ecosystems. Volcanoes release about 100 million tons per year - humanity contributes much more than that. Global Warming is not the same as climate change. There are different climate patterns eg unseasonal snow and rain, but the overall temperature is rising. No scientist disagrees upon that, whichever 'side' of the debate they are on. The question is how much of the temperature rise is generated by humanity and how much is due to natural fluctuations - that is a completely different issue. The temperature is rising, but the data does not make it clear whether this is an effect of CO2 emissions or a normal warming of the Earth after an Ice-Age period. Personally, after reviewing the evidence, I believe that humanity is having an effect, but I certainly would not gamble on it! Maybe 70:30 convinced, if you know what I mean. As Scott says, the media and propaganda have destroyed any chance of reasonable debate. As a scientist, I hate the fact that BOTH sides of the argument manipulate research. I detest Al Gore as much as you - people like him have politicised the debate beyond recognition. I walked out of 'An Inconvenient Truth' after about 15 minutes! To again repeat Scott, it is difficult enough to find solid research even when you know what you are looking for. To find a good source on the Internet is virtually impossible, so believe nothing that you read online. The real answer, as stated above, is that nobody is sure one way or another. I certainly count myself amongst that number.
- Not "who?" but "What?" The answer to this is the multiverse.+2
- Not sure how the Big Bang is the beginning of evolution...+1
- Why in the world was this taken off of the "top" page...
- How can this be misinterpreted... the entire point of the parentheses is to point out that they are not the main term being used to describe the choice. It's very difficult to misrepresent Creationsim with "creation" and Evolution with "Evolution." The Religion/Science addon simply explains where the theory came from.+3
- You really can't judge a president based on the first 1-3 years of their term. In fact, it often takes 5-6 years (after the president has ended their term, or into their 2nd) to truly be able to judge them as being good or bad.+2
- I read an interesting question which was not answered. @Random1234 - Do you actually like Ron Paul, or do you just hate Obama? Would you prefer someone over both of them?+2
- Not exactly. You wouldn't be able to tell the difference between scary things and real scary things (like burglers dressed in monster masks) that might harm you.
- Always... I want to mate with you and masturbate with you and live in harmony harmony alllwaaaayyysss+1
- Don't they both?
- Racism has effects on gender. It goes both ways.
- Fun fact: Every human being is racist. Those who claim to be completely unbiased when it comes to race are either directly lying in order to escape social stigma and persecution, or simply are not aware of their racist minds. The reason for this is that some peoples' racism is very minimal. Such people don't mistreat other races and they usually don't have intentional racist thoughts. However, such individuals have been tested in research studies for racism and have been found to be "minimally" yet still "measurably" racist. This was done by flashing images of various races at them, and measuring the "surprise" reaction of the brain. Those who were shown other races reacted in a higher level of surprise than pictures of the same race. Hence, there is more racism in the world than sexism.+4
- If they both wanted you dead, it would probably be easier to escape the cats. Cats don't run as fast as lions and are easier to defend against. For example, if you cover yourself in mittens, a think winter coat, and 3-4 layers of clothes, it would take the cats a while to rip through that, buying you time to escape into car/house/whatever. The lions would simply rip you in half.+1
- I have no idea what that thing on the right is (probably on the skin of a finger), but it looks like a disease.
- A well-made argument. However, as I said in my comment, I'd be "putting my bet on humanity." It's a gamble and a pretty high risk, but I would take it nontheless.
- This.
- What if you get caught and are sentenced to life imprisonment?
- This, and you would suffer physical pain.+1
- Wrong. Immortality =/= indestructibility. You can still get injured, burned, dismembered, beaten, shot, and you would feel all the pain, lose the body parts, but still not die. You seem to be the one who is "f*cking retarded" it seems, because you fail to analyze the option and jump to conclusions and assumptions instead.+4
- You be trollin' me.
- You would rather die than watch a movie? You must be either very suicidal, very pessimistic, very untruthful, or very unintelligent. Instead of wasting less than 24 hours of your life, you would waste all of it.
- Strange how you think you know everything about me off of a comment on a website made for fun. You're right, I don't currently have a girlfriend and that's perfectly fine. You're probably one of those people who think that having one is crucial to be successful or "not a nerd/geek." I bet you're projecting your own personal failure in order to compensate for the miserable excuse for an intellect that you have. Oh and I've had lasting relationships, so your point is invalid.
- That would depend on what kind of "suffer" is implied? Am I being tortured, or am I just "suffering" the social stigma of vegans looking down on me for it?
- Very.+1
- Food Serving Iron (mg) Abiyuch 1 cup 3.67 Acerola Juice 1 cup 1.2 Apple Juice 1 cup 0.92 Apples, with Skin 1 cup, slices 0.13 Applesauce, Sweetened 1 cup 0.89 Applesauce, Unsweetened 1 cup 0.29 Apricot Nectar, Condensed 1 cup 0.95 Apricots 1 cup, halves 0.6 Apricots, Dried 1 cup, halves 3.46 Avocados, California 1 cup, pureed 1.4 Avocados, Florida 1 cup, pureed 0.39 Bananas 1 cup, mashed 0.59 Blackberries 1 cup 0.89 Blueberries 1 cup 0.41 Boysenberries, Frozen 1 cup, unthawed 1.12 Breadfruit 1 cup 1.19 Cantaloupe 1 cup, cubes 0.34 Carambola 1 cup, cubes 0.11 Carissa 1 cup, slices 1.97 Casaba Melon 1 cup, cubes 0.58 Cherimoya 1 cup, diced 0.47 Cherries, Sour, Red 1 cup 0.5 Cherries, Sweet 1 cup 0.5 Clementines 1 fruit 0.1 Crabapples 1 cup, slices 0.4 Cranberries 1 cup, whole 0.25 Currants, European Black 1 cup 1.72 Currants, Red+1
- In no way do I disagree that this is a loaded question by a vegan/vegetarian, but I must point out that fruit have iron.
- Indeed. Hence, I denied them the satisfaction of getting on the "biggest difference" section.+1
- This question is vegan.
- I'd like to bring up an interesting point to those who are voting: We don't know exactly what kind of "suffering" is implied by the question. Is it physical pain? Perhaps it is caused from rare cases of indigestion/stomach pains. Or are we "suffering" the social stigma of having judgemental, ignorant vegans/vegetarians looking down on us for refusing to go against our biological omnivorous ancestry? Meat all the way baby.+4
- I don
- I don't particularly like cold tea.
- That's the risk you take.
- What if you get burried under 5 tons of earth?
- Do it right before you die. Wtf is the point of god mode if you can still be suppressed? (For example, frozen solid or burried under an avalanche/rockslide?
- :P
- You would witness everyone you love/know getting old and eventually dying. Also, when our sun turns into a Red Giant, you would likely be forever alone.
- Nope. You don't control anything. It's entirely automatic. Meaning, if you want to die, you can't. You don't gain super strength or anything like that. If you're burried alive, you can't escape until the earth is destroyed by the sun, or until you are rescued (unlikely). Also, all friends/family die.
- I changed my mind the moment I voted for option A, because I didn't fully understand what "quicksave" and "quickload" ment. Wonder if I could have multiple quicksaves at the same time :P
- no
- Question is, would your parents believe you at such a young age? Answer: Probably, because you would display an adult intelligence within a child.
- That's colloquialism. Just slang.
- Ofcourse it is. Once I'm dead, it wouldn't concern me as to what happens to the human race, because I would be dead.
- Or you could simply not have children and then hopefully die of old age, after your family does.
- I'm sure you can eat other stuff in between. However, if you can't, ketchup usually has more vitamins/minerals than vinegar. It can also be enriched with such substances. I rarely see vinegar with such qualities.
- Atheist, because then we wouldn't be slowed down by religious morals and ethics.
- I'd rather do my sister than my whole family. That was the point of my comment, if it was sister, i'd have switched my vote to A.+1
- Your comment does not make a valid example. Letting 1000 criminals free does not mean they will each commit a crime again. The point of my comment was "to let criminals free is better than to harm innocent people." It wasn't "It is better to allow criminals to commit more crimes than to punish an innocent."
- Also, my comment is a famous quote, not my own. Hence, quotations.
- You have a very small mind. I'm already an average skateboarder.
- Actually, I did see it, and you're right. It did not live up to my expectations.
- China is not practicing fundamental communism.
- The true form of fundamental communism doesn't have a government. Instead, it is a direct democracy. The people need no government because the govern themselves. The United States is not a direct Democracy.
- Actually, if you "just sit around all day" you wouldn't get paid. You would be expected to work the same amount of time if you were healthy, as other healthy individuals. If nobody worked, there would be no pay to give out. Also, rather than advocationg class war, there would be an elimination of social classes.
- Who said anything about Christianity?
- I completely missed the "main" part of it :P
- The lesser of two evils?
- Also, Venus has a crushing atmosphere.
- I'm pretty sure you would burn on one side and freeze on the other.+1
- Preferably the one that is secretly female.
- I'd love to be friends with Hermione!+2
- It can be said that the multiverse always was, since it's not an event, but rather an existing entity.+3
- I must point out though that I'm not sure if I actually believe in the multiverse or not. I'd have to do some research.+3
- From what I heard, Romney brags about his money. I don't like that.
- From what I heard, Romney brags about his money. I don't like that.+2
- There really is no "duh" in this. Some parents prefer to teach their children themselves, because they know what they want to talk about. Others prefer schools to teach children to avoid awkwardness or because the parents themselves have no idea what they're talking about.+4
- htt p:// www.physorg .co m/news/2010-12-scientists-evidence-universes .h tml+2
- Found this from a quick google search. I'm sure there's plenty more, otherwise this theory would only be a hypothesis, thought of by a very small group of people.+2
- I disagree.+2
- Science can answer this. The first and most obvious scientific explanation for egyptian weapons being found at the bottom of the Red Sea can quite simply be from Egyptian aquatic vessels sinking while carrying weapons. Another possibility is At-Sea burrial by those who did not believe in the Egyptian system of mummification, but still believed that the deceased carried their belongings to the afterlife. A third possibility is that the weapons being found were placed there intentionally by those who claim to be finding them. This is debatable both ways.+3
- Furthermore, I would like to point out the flaw in your "i am trying to save you guys" logic. Do you honestly believe that some people will convert to your religion just by reading your comment? If so, then by the same means I could tell you that you should convert to Deism because I'm just trying to save you from a wasted life on Earth. Would you convert? At best, it's unlikely. Would you convert solely from my comment? Not a chance. Another thing - How do you know why got has put you here? You cannot fathom the infinite wisdom of God, so how can you make the assumption that you know what he wanted you to do? Perhaps God had a different plan in mind for you. The thing is - neither you nor I know.+3
- You don't know that. You haven't died yet to find out whether or not they were right or wrong. Your comment is worthless, Californian guest.+2
- Not all evolutionists believe in the Big Bang. Not all Big Bang believers accept Evolution.
- You are correct in your statement. Indeed, atheists commit the same act. In fact, there are people of all religions who raise their children to blindly believe in what the parents do. As for your question - I for one was raised to be Eastern Orthodox. I was baptized, went to church, etc. Fun fact: I still wear the cross which was given to me during or around the time of my baptism. Some time passed; I gained education and awareness of other beliefs. I often pondered religious philosophy, believing in reincarnation for a while, but I eventually switched my beliefs to Deism.
- Minus the black stuff on top, that smoked salmon bagel looks delicious.+2
- You can train yourself to get stronger. You can't train yourself to get more attractive.+8
- WWE is fake, but Big Show seems nicer.+2
- How about both?+2
- That looks just like my cat.
- Correct. However, human ethics believe in equal opportunity of each individual. Such as women being allowed to have lower standards than men in order to qualify for Military/Firefighter/Police service. However, there is also sexism which has no validity. For example, women not being allowed to vote, or women receiving less pay than men who have the same position and work the same length of time.+4
- Why is this on the "top" section....+2
- From their older friends who are of legal age and wouldn't really care about giving some to a minor while they're high.
- No. Legalize it. If anything, drinking hard alcohol should be made illegal.+2
- Mexican druglords.
- The mohawk in the image is about 3 feet in length.+3
- some cacti have spines that are soft and bendy. Like hair.+1
- maggots only eat dead flesh
- Failure son, I am disappoint. You dishonor your famaree! If son fails, its his fault. He can help himself or die worthless.
- The concept is very complex and advanced, quite difficult to understand really. We don't have all of the answers yet ofcourse, and we might never have ALL of the answers. There are also probably some flaws in the current multiverse theories as well as the universe definition. Hence, the reply is correct. We need to reconsider our definition of the universe.+3
- There is not enough evidence to conclude that. Both originated in oral traditions that predate any written record of either. One can assume and one can make arguments, but no argument will ever be able to prove conclusively which came first, or which influenced the other.
- Wash mouth afterwards.+6
- Polish sausage is delicious!+4
- Vultures are detrivores. They only eat decaying/already-dead meat. They wouldn't eat a live human. Lions on the other hand have no problem ripping you to pieces while you're still alive. After I'm dead, I don't care what happens to my body.+9
- What good is freedom if you have to s uffer for it?+11
- Duh??+7
- If nobody notices, that means nobody notices the smell either. Who cares if I walk funny? I'd rather not have people think i peed my pants :P+5
- They come after me doesn't mean they will succeed.+4
- This isn't even that difficult a question... If you're going to skip questions that aren't extremely gross, get off of this site.+2
- If I invest the 20,000,000 in a bank, at an interest rate of .5% interest per year, I would make $100,000 per year. I can live for a year off of that, support a family, and would never have to work again in my life. Instead, I would seek out a career which I enjoy, not caring at all about how much I am paid.+2
- Whoops, said interest 2x.
- I'd love to have the physical activities available to me.+1
- I'd rather die from an ant. The hair disease looks nasty and people would notice it much easier than the ant imo.+6
- Grows back vs doesn't grow back.+5
- By that logic, if the chicken came first it wouldn't have any other chickens to reproduce with. The answer to this is that the egg would be nurtured by chicken-like organsims that gave birth to it. Evolution.
- Indeed it does.
- You haven't posted in so long :( I miss your funny/entertaining/informative replies.+2
- Or maybe he just likes bestiality.
- Just divorse the horse.
- PC is soooooo much better
- You voted wrong.
- well over 90% of "good" games (good meaning at least 100,000 people play them) are not playable on t he Mac. It's also hella easier to play games on the PC than the mac.+1
- who da fck would buy a mac
- I bet half of the people who voted for Mac don't know the full name. I also bet that when such people ready my comment and find it to be true, they will look it up on the internet and claim that I am wrong.+2
- Neither do humans.
- Potential that can be equally good or evil. It could be a Stephen Hawking or Albert Einstein baby, or it can be an Adolf Hitler/Joseph Stalin baby.
- Which is why it would be better to kill 1 baby instead of 100 puppies. It's just like killing 1 baby vs 100 babies.+1
- Exactly.+1
- It's either all living creatures have souls or none of them do. Dogs have a conscience just as humans do. The conscience is essencially the soul, because without it, you cease to exist.+2
- Not "babies," Baby.+1
- What's wrong with you!? If a baby will live an average of 80 years and a puppy about 15, then 100 puppies will live a combined total of 1500 years. A baby could become somebody evil, murder, destroy families, while an "evil" puppy pees in the house and bites you sometimes. I vote baby even though it is of my species because there are already too many of them and the Human Population could use a reduction.+1
- No life is more important.+2
- 100 lives vs 1 life
- You chose puppies... you did answer.
- I think you ment
- "don't like killing anything"+1
- Really California?
- Who cares if it's a human or not? Humans are animals. Dogs are animals. Both are capable of experiencing pain, pleasure, emotion, memory, and intelligence.+2
- You did answer. You chose puppies.+1
- Or is it a Tourist Question?
- You didn't pass, you voted baby.+1
- I wouldn't hate you, and that's already not the whole world. Almost everyone who voted for baby wouldn't hate you. That's a lot of people, especially since about 7 billion people haven't voted. Yes, there are now over 7 billion people living on the Earth.
- Nobody finds out about either I believe.
- Sure there is. You took 100 lives instead of 1 life.+1
- Humans are animals. Dogs are animals.+1
- Actually, puppies will. 1 baby will hurt depending on the person. Emotionally, you won't be able to forgive yourself and would try to seek repention/forgiveness by being a better person or helping other babies. If you kill 100 puppies, after a certain point you will stop caring about the puppies, becoming hardened against the death of animals, thus in the future, you would be more likely to abuse animals becaouse you wouldn't care if they died or not.
- nobody gives a f*ck about some dumbass baby..its stupid..really..
- Abortions happen all the time. Both naturally and artificially by human intervention. What's one more death going to do?
- You hurt many living things with pollution. Also, pollution harms humans too.+2
- lol I'm vote 27777
- Actually it does. As we find more evidence, some versions of history are changed in favor of the newly-supported versions.
- Don't worry, we helped make it 50-50 again.
- Disaster movie sucks!+1
- Batman is physically strong and successful due to his own training and hard work. Spiderman got bitten by a spider.+1
- GUYS I figured it out! The question asks: Would you rather... A) Have your body cut off but not your head. (Your head remains alive and you don't die from bleeding/suffication and stuff. Like Futurama jars)* or B) Have your head cut off but YOUR BODY remains alive, capable of interacting with the environment and having a conscience, but you have no head.
- Fix'd.
- Marriage is a complete waste. It's much better to have a lasting relationship as a boyfriend and girlfriend for 10 years before getting married.
- Wrong. You can get shot in the head and live.
- "you are choice"+3
- Spaghetti is disgusting to me.
- Rude. "Go die!" ??? Thou shalt not kill. - This doesn't just mean "don't kill people." It also means "Don't make people die through your actions." Suggesting people to go die is the same as trying to influence them to die, thus you are contributing to their death if they decide to commit suicide, etc.+6
- "everyone knows god created the world" - Wrong. Just from this poll, over 30,000 people have said that God did not create the world.+2
- I don't understand how you got this idea from the question.+1
- Which idiots god?
- Well actually, no. In that case the Big Bang wins because if God created the Big Bang, then the Big Bang, and not God, directly created the world. In this situation, God would have indirectly created the world.
- They don't have to be, but if you believe in both, your vote should have been for Big Bang.
- They both have scientific evidence that backs them. In fact, there is a lot of scientific evidence for God.+1
- You don't know what the Big Bang Theory is if you think it states that everything exploded from nothing.+1
- You don't "need" one, but you can still have one.
- Of course there's no way to prove the Big Bang created the universe. The scientific definition of "prove" and "proof" is a paradox in itself, since you can't prove anything. Also, we know that "nothing came before it" is false. This has been investigated with theories such as the Multiverse. Also, neither religion nor the Big Bang are "fairy tails." Both have evidence, and both have their uses which can be applied to individual lives.+1
- How is religion not important anymore, if more people believe in the Big Bang than God creating the world? You can believe in both.
- Quite obvious.
- No point even having a teacher if they're boring and easy. You wouldn't learn anything because it's so boring that you dont pay attention. The tests would be easy enough to pass the class without learning, so it would be worthless.+13
- honestly, neither one attracts me.+2
- I don't find muslim women attractive.+1
- Marry =/= sex.
- Also. Step 1. Marry Hilton Step 2. Acquire the money. Step 3. Divorse.
- Oh, by the way, let me just say that psychologically speaking, in such a situation, almost 95% of people directly involved would save people by risking their lives. This is a collective existance effect, where every person in danger feels as if they are all together part of a single entity that must be preserved. Many people stayed to help others. Quite a few of those died in the process, but more were saved through their actions than would have been if nobody risked their life to help. Meaning, they accomplished the collective goal of preserving as much life as possible of the combined single entity. Fun stuff, psychology is.+5
- Guys in school would ask me for favors, introducing her to them or giving her a good word for them. I'd ask for favors in return.+3
- Easily. You would more than make up for the lost time if you're middle or upper-middle class. You would have to make 1 million dollars a year, or already have a family to choose B.
- Never got into B.
- Hermione! Hey, Hermione! I can produce a very large patronus when I think about you, because the thought of you makes something vast and silver appear from the tip of my wand. And if you touch my scrotum in the right place, I'll expecto my patronum all over your face.+6
- faaa+5
- PETA needs to die.
- I just want to say - PETA is full of hypocritical, radical idiots.+6
- Those of you who chose 2 random powers... have just acquired the power to shrink your penis as small as you want!+2
- Exactly...? Re-read what I wrote.+1
- Why thank you :)+1
- I for one, am rather surprised that someone from Texas chose the Big Bang.+4
- If you are going to argue this, at least properly describe the people who lived 2000 years ago which you mentioned. If this were to be true, the people who "tricked" others with religion would have been rich, powerful, and few in number. Your statement suggests that religion was used to control the masses.
- You can believe in God and not believe that God created the world.
- In other words, you would never have truly lived.+1
- I'm surprised that so many voted for option A. In Russia, there is a common belief that you do not truly enter the world until you have opened your eyes, not left the womb. It's considered acceptable, for example, to drown kittens if their eyes have not yet opened. This type of post-birth abortion is considered morally acceptable because the kittens have never experienced the world, so they wouldn't be deprived of something they didn't yet have.
- I love nightmares.
- So... Anarchists who feel completely free of any law, are experiencing one of the best feelings
- Incorrect. Britain was not nearly as "tyranical" as the U.S. system of social studies makes it out to be. If you actually research the reasons why the Colonists began rebelling (Tea Tax) and how the colonists responded (Boston Tea Party), you will see that we were the real tyrants. The prices of Tea tax was much higher in Britain than in the English colonies. We simply thought that the prices were high because for a long time, Britain completely ignored the colonies, not taxing them at all. Then suddenly, when they decided to open trade and place a tax on tea, we responded by sneaking into their ships, smashing their product, blaming the Indians for the damages, and refusing to pay reparations. Now who did you say was total tyranny?+1
- "Limited freedom" and "no freedom" are two completely different things. Complete freedom is Anarchy. Any form of government results in "limited freedom." Hence, the United States gives us limited freedom. If I had an easy life and "limited freedom," I would have the freedom that the U.S. gives us, plus the benefit of an easy life. If I had true, full freedom (Anarchy), I would have a terrible life because everyone would hate me if I acted on the freedom.
- I'm upset that you can even compare these two. Harry Potter is a legend which will remain a strong presence for decades to come. Like Star Wars. Twilight on the other hand, will fade away.+3
- Neither. I don't like country music, but I don't go attacking people who made it with hate and statements like "I want to get rid of them." I don't like Beiber's music, I don't like how Rebecca Black uses an autotune, thus no musical talent. They still deserve to exist though... basic human right.
- However, even though I said neither, I voted for R.B. instead of J.B. because R.B. as stated in the below comment, does not have nearly as much musical talent.
- Obama has not been the president for 8 years. Name a few good things Bush did. Then tell me what year of his service he did those good things.
- That's because Bush's foreign policy is looked down upon by most other countires.+1
- 1. all you conservatives do is blame obama, someone who has not even had 4 years to accomplish his goals, for Bush's terrible record, which was made over a course of 8 years and thus is still affecting society today. Unfortunately, instead of understanding how the flow of presidency works, and that the previous president directly affects the first few years of the next president, you simply choose to blame Obama. 2. He didn't kill OBL, the troops did. I dont see how anyone could argue this, seeing as how no matter which president it was, OBL would have been killed eventually. 3. Just shut up, you're giving intelligent conservatives a bad name.
- Ron Paul reminds me of McCain.
- Old as hell. Very likely to die during his term.
- Nope. He hasn't actually created a measureable factor of improvement or destruction. We will find out after his presidency is over.
- And... bush didn
- Bush didn't? Sure he did. Yet, the recession didn't disappear.
- You must understand that the age level of this website varies from adults to as low as 6 year olds. *I know, because my little brother-in-law often visits Rrrather.*
- Actually, if he was making 150,000k salary, he would likely have paid 30,000,000 in taxes.+1
- My father makes around $120,000 a year and he pays roughly $25,000 in income tax.+1
- Actually, every politician since political campaigns began, has lied. Some more than others, but Bush does not have a clear sleight.
- 4 trillion dollars over 8 years? lol...
- Bush had 8 years to get sh*t done. You're not even giving Obama 4.
- This is clearly wrong. Your last sentence proved to me the degree of your lack of political and governmental intelligence. And let me tell you sir, that degree is over nine thousand.
- Fox is completely biased.
- Nope, bush doesn't rule. He already served his 2 terms :P
- I noticed that a lot of you have said that "both are horrible." Well you know what? If you were put into the position of the President, chances are, everyone would hate you because you would be 10x worse.
- Notice by the way, how not a single country with more than 1 vote has a majority for Bush. Says a lot about the world of rrrather users.
- If you want an overpriced computer with a bunch of apps, Mac. If you want a computer for gaming, good economic value, and access to Flash, PC.+7
- The difference is that instead of killing one life, you kill 100.
- Also, the human population is well over 6 billion. I'd estimate it at 7 Billion actually. The dog population is far less than this. So compare the two. You're killing the larger choice within a smaller population than a smaller choice within a larger population.
- Wait a second.... are you Random1234?
- Are you Random1234?
- Why do you believe humans have a soul while animals don't?
- Also, if you believe in Heaven and Souls, then it's better to kill someone with a soul than someone without a soul. The reason? I'm not sure exactly how it was worded, but something in Christianity believes that children of a very young age who are killed, go to heaven. If dogs don't have a soul, they only have their life on Earth. By killing the child, you gaurontee it eternal happiness in heaven. By killing the dogs, you deprive them of the one chance to live, since they wouldn't have an afterlife.
- My sick what?
- Neither do humans.
- Which is exactly why I'd rather kill a baby. Even though I don't believe that souls exist, even if they did, the baby would be the obvious choice.
- have you ever seen how many living organisms die per year because of human attacks?
- Pet dogs account for 31 deaths per year in the U.S. Do you know how many pet dogs die from abusive owners per year? Well into the thousands.
- So by killing the baby, not only do you save the 100 puppies, you would also save the many animals that the baby would have eaten.
- Random1234, I don't even understand what you're trying to argue with this. The question has nothing to do with eating of animals. You don't kill cows, chickens, and turkeys with your bare hands. Hence you are not the result of their death. So no, you don't kill someone because he ate meat. But what does this answer to your question accomplish in regard to the the baby-or-dogs matter? Nothing.
- Let me put this little tidbit of information in: What will the baby grow up to be? "A baby has more potential than a dog." This does not necessarily mean good potential. Sure, the baby could grow up to be an Albert Einstein or a Michael Anjelo, or a George Washington. However, that baby has an equal chance of growing up to be an Adolf Hitler, a Joseph Stalin, or a member of Al Quaeda.
- he kills people because of his awful voice? Someone's jealous... if he has such an awful voice, why is he world-famous for his music while you're a nobody? Is it because your voice is worse than his? By your logic, yes. In other words, your voice kills people.
- People who hardcore hate on Justin Beiber are just jealous of his talent because they didn't get to be millionaires before the age of 21. Frankly, if you don't like him, don't listen to him. You don't have to be douchebags. I chose jackson because I actually like some of his songs. Not because I'm a sheep that will be more than happy to jump onto the we-hate-Justin-Beiber bandwagon.+2
- You took the words right out of my mouth :P
- If you're poor, and your "true love" is poor, it would have been better to get the $10,000,000. If you're already loaded with money, you don't need more so obviously true love would be the better choice.+2
- If I'm with a girl that I love, ski lift. Cuddle for warmth ftw. If alone, elevator. Screw the cold.+1
- Another tidbit: What if the baby isn't white? Yes, this is a racist remark, but some people would be more okay with killing a baby that isn't of a certain race. You can call this comment racist if you want, but every human being is to a certain extent racist. When it comes to racism, there is no such thing as innocence - only degrees of guilt.
- Why would I want to look at peoples' bones? If you mean glasses that let you see through cloths, that's technicaly "selectively-permiable vision" glasses.+1
- Also, if it was an invisibility cloak vs glasses that see through clothes, why would you rather look, when you can walk up and touch?+1
- Cuddle with girlfriend for warmth ftw+11
- i like blu
- Isn't powerade just a cheap knockoff of Gatorade?+3
- Ponies don't exist anyway so... :P
- Sure it does! If you're gauronteed to win something, you may as well do it in the way that is most fun for you.+2
- Personally, i think deal or no deal is more fun.+3
- The power to have complete control over reality.
- Personally I hate banana so I chose oranges. Then I realized that it was food, not just fruit. However, orange is my 2nd favorite color so it remains.
- I'm sure that thousands of people would die in both scenarios because if there is a financial cricis, people will feel depressed, some might starve, resort to alcohol, etc. and die because of it. The process would be slow though. I'd rather take my chances in a violent revolution.+3
- If only thousands of people die over the course of 3 years, that's fairly reasonable.+3
- More civilians died than military units. Also, if far less destructive weapons like mustard gas are condemned and illegal, of course nuclear weapons should have been condemned and made illegal.+5
- eyes that blink sideways are fking wierd.+1
- Use as a storage unit.+12
- It's supposed to be "run for a month or walk with leg braces for a month." With your logic, why not just change 5 minutes to 1 second?+5
- What's wrong with Snooki getting pregnant...?
- I always wanted to know what actually happens if you go there.+12
- Once again, I'll repeat myself. Evolutionists, atheists, and those who believe in the Big Bang are NOT THE SAME THING! Not all evolutionists believe in the Big Bang and not all Big Bang believers accept evolution. If you're going to respond to an insulting comment with an equally insulting comment, at least do it properly.
- Actually you can press "skip."+1
- Now it shows you voted for puppies xD looks like you're getting shot twice!+3
- And so are you.+1
- As I pointed out in my comment, yes I am racist. And so are you, and every other human being on this planet. Scientific research has provided emperical evidence that the human brain is wired to be racist to varying degrees. See my post on the question "woudl you rather end sexism or racism"+1
- Spend the rest of your time left with your significant other, rather than be too senile to even understand what was going on.+2
- Assuming the ants had the same proportional strength (being able to carry many times their body weight), they would likely win. If nothing else, they would devastate the human population in ways which will never be recoverable.+2
- Agreed.+6
- First thing I thought when I saw option A was Jersey Shore.+10
- Idk about Rhinos, but elephants don't have sexual intercourse.
- Too many boys as it is. I oppose China's preference of male children.+8
- I'd rather use a computer for most of the things an Ipad offers.+3
- Well as long as he sells them to a family that is willing to take care of them (similar to adoption), then it's fine. If he sells them as slaves then that's just wrong on so many levels.
- Actually, you made a good point. The only thing I could respond to this with is "you're just making yourself look as bad as she did." But that's not necessarily true because you intentionally did it to show how flawed her comment is. So I'll give you that - I didn't take her comment into account as much as I should have. However, I must on a side-note point out that perhaps she is talking about some of those who commented about their religious beliefs. Though that doesn't take any of the rudeness away from her comment...+1
- It cannot be proven one way or the other.+1
- It cannot be proven one way or the other.
- That's doesn't prove anything. These are just assersions.+1
- But you can still be religious and believe in the big bang... You can be a Buddhist or another religion that doesn't believe in the existence of God. This way you would be both religious and a believer of the Big Bang.
- Oh, you were referring to "in one ear, out the other?" That has a double meaning - the 'hearing and forgetting' meaning and the 'attaining information and discarding it' definition. :P
- Hello admin. You bring about an interesting point which has seen much debating. I'll give my input on this matter: What is a year in the bible? It doesn't explicitly state that a year is 365 days and that a day is 24 hours. It could very well be that instead of being "human years," the 6000 years mentioned in the Bible are "God years" which may be much longer than a human-made year according to a calendar.
- It actually depends on what kind of war is fought. If it is a nuclear war, well... neither because it would result in MAD. If it was a ground war, China because of their numbers. If it was an all out war without nukes, probably Russia because their military is better equipped than China.+1
- I'm pretty sure China is a nuclear power.+1
- Someone's conceited.+3
- I must say....... if you have a perfect face and not a perfect body........... or a perfect body and not a perfect face, it will not look good. It is all about proportions. However, this only applies to when people would actually see your body. Hence, I chose the face.
- Compared to some of your questions, this is Einstein level.
- What tim5o said is true. Also, I was talking specifically about physician-assisted suicide. The thing is - some people think this is outright murder because the physicians are indirectly killing the patients.
- Birth control wouldn't delete a baby. Instead it would prevent the baby from ever forming.+1
- Smart
- Exactly. You chose the correct answer.+1
- Lol you already said what I didn't want to have anyone say with your comment above. "aids kills only your immune system." This was a question to test the intelligence of the voters. Some didn't know this :P+1
- Actually, over 90% of circumcisions in the U.S. are performed on non-Jewish persons.+4
- But humans have the capacity to kill animals painlessly.
- impaled in the finger.+3
- Yep!
- You are always ready to please your partner and you don't run out of sexual endurance. Or... You can't have sex.+4
- You could still look "decent" but not good. You could become good-looking over time. See Neville Longbottom.
- I don't hold a specific affiliation with the democrats or the republicans. For example, I believe in the right to Abortions, unlike the Republican Party. However, I also support the death penalty, which roughly 80% of Republicans also support. My views are mixed. But this is getting off topic.+1
- I disagree.
- hah I answered them from top up, so this was actually only the 2nd time I asked.
- Well... we also don't know that souls exist. We only make the assersion that they do. So too does the Bible make the assersion that children are innocent and "incapable of discerning good from evil." Thus, they would not be able to reject Jesus Christ (for Christianity) or any other religious figure of any other religion. If you're saying that God would have judged the baby based on how it "would have lived," then you're getting into the philosophical ideas of predestination and fatalism (We are destined to perform every action we take, because God has predetermined it and already knows we will make these actions). This takes away Free Will, hence making it impossible for people to make the decision to be "good or evil." Such an issue is very complicated and deserves it's own question on Rrrather.
- The baby wouldn't go to hell (assuming it exists) because the Bible provides insight on this, that God spares those who are incapable of telling the difference between good and evil, along with those who are mentally not developed enough to accept God. What about all of the abortions, miscarriages, etc... why would God send those innocent lives who have not even transgressed against him yet... to hell? It would make no sense.
- I believe that the dependence on a God for an afterlife is form of coping with the fear of the unknown state of existence, or rather nonexistence, that is death. What happens when I die? Do I just cease to exist? Does that mean "bad" people cease to exist in the same way as "good" people? Does it not matter if you were rich or poor? If you struggled or had everything handed to you? Hmm.... this scares me deeply so I think I'll believe in something that would have infinite wisdom, knowledge, and fairness. God. This way, those who get away on crimes on Earth and aren't properly punished, get punished after death. It's infalliable! Oh, but God might punish me too, so I should worship him and follow his laws to ensure my place in the afterlife as one of the "good" people. - All from fear. That's my opinion at the very least.
- You can believe in god and the big bang at the same time :P
- Call her a b1tch back :P
- It can be good gosip too :)
- Indeed this is true.
- I currently possess a networth of less than $50,000. $25,000 is not going to enable people in desperate need to live a better life. Now, if somehow it would enable every person on the planet to live a life at or above the poverty line, sure. But in this case, no. Life's a game of luck. You either get the opportunities to enrich it or you don't.
- I believe in limited Pro Choice. What does that mean? It means, I believe women should have the right to an abortion once or maybe 2 times a year at most. This way, people aren't using it as a monthly birth control. Situations such as rape and life-threatening conditions don't count. Frankly, there is nothing wrong with an abortion. In fact, the human body naturally has its own abortions where the zygote commits suicide intentionally because of a genetic mismatch if the sperm/egg cell had extra chromosomes or something else that would have led to a disorder in life. However, some situations don't trigger this to happen. For example, Down Syndrome zygotes often dont go through a self-induced abortion.+2
- However, there is something wrong with not using condoms and getting an abortion every time you get pregnant. Those who don't practice sex responsibly don't deserve the option.+4
- Rude.
- My example is that we see evolution in bacteria on a daily basis. For example, advancements in TB's resistance to drugs. You might say: "That's just bacteria. You don't see evolution in humans, animals, or any multicellular organism for that matter." False. Evolution may be seen in humans. Remember the Bubonic Plague? Classic case of rapid evolution. Those who were resistent to the disease were less likely to get infected by the disease-carrying flea and thus survived to reproduce. Now, may European and Asian populations are naturally resistant to the disease.
- On a side note, I must point out that there is no such thing as proof. You cannot ask for it, and you cannot say you have it. I really enjoy stressing this point. This also goes to those who say there is "proof" of the Big Bang and evolution. There isn't.
- Neither is provable, only supported. The very definition of proof is a paradox.
- @guest from newcastle - Science is not 100% provable. If you knew anything about the scientific definition of proof, you would know that it is unattainable. That is the beauty of theories - they can never be proven and thus are maleable and changable over time.
- Since when is Jew an insult? I hope you're not a Neo Nazi... also, (you're*) if you're going to insult someone, do it properly.+2
- Sorry, but it's not yet a fact. Humans are far too young and primitive to understand such sophisticated concepts.
- As random1234 has pointed out, a simple statement such as Portugal Guest's can easily be restated on the other end. Please elaborate :D+2
- lol you sound like me...
- God, you intolerant people! Accept other peoples' right to believe what they want!+1
- Going to church has nothing to do with believing in the big bang.
- I'm glad at least some people are showing a decent amount of tolerance for the other viewpoint.
- Hmm... no. You are an absolute retard for being so rude. Hence, your argument (which makes me sad because I believe in the Big Bang) is made invalid.
- No. Nobody here is wrong, except for those who blindly deny the possibility of the other viewpoint. This goes for both God believers, Big Bang believers, and those who believe in both alike.+1
- How is this website false and "sladerous?" I think you're overreacting or perhaps are butthurt that your side isn't winning. Umad?+1
- Show a little tolerance, people.+1
- Rape.+3
- Burt seems slightly more mature.+1
- ... better to have 4 friends than no friends.+3
- The point of the site is to answer! Even if it's gross, disgusting, disturbing, immoral, or flat out evil.+9
- You don't feel pain while dreaming. Also, I would attempt to take control of the dream via lucid dreaming.+4
- Sea glass.
- oh my god yes
- Someone who knows what felching is.+1
- look it up
- Fun fact: Ranchers often bite baby deer testicles off with their teeth.
- lol read up on my posts from about a week ago.
- For better or for worse.+5
- Well... actually I've had times where I wished I had been an abortion.
- You can believe in life after death and not believe in God. See reincarnation.
- WHAT IF! @in response to Guest fom North Carolina (3 posts below me) - What if the supercondenced matter that exploded and came to be known as the Big Bang... WAS GOD! Da da daaaaa.... No seriously though, this should be considered. Why should God be a person? The idea that we are modeled after his image is repulsive and if someone wants to challenge me on this, i'll reply to their comment. Anyway, lets say that the supercondenced mass itself was God. Now, it can be said that the supercondenced mass always existed. It exists currenly too and always will exist (because it's just spread out now. If you condense all the matter in the universe, you would get that "god" mass again. Stay with me now, it says in various religious texts that God created the universe and humans, etc. Well... if the Big Bang mass of matter was God, then this is true. "God" aka the Big Bang, would have created everything in existence and eventually through evolution and natural selection and whatnot, humans would have entered the picture. So through an indirect means, God created humans. What about the whole "6 days and rested on the 7th" thing? Well... who says these are human days? "day" is relative. A day on earth is not the same length as a day on Neptune or Mars. For all we know, a "God" day could be billions of years in our prespective. In my opinion, we have to distinguish between the religious text that alludes to possible realities and the religious text that is complete mumbo jumbo created to control the masses or simply through the inclusion of biased humans in the picture. This is why I don't believe in Adam and Eve. I believe its mumbo jumbo created by primitive humans in an effort to appease the masses as well as control them (because, if God created humans, he must be strong, can punish me, and I better pay the religious leaders my time and money to avoid eternal suffering!). If you are still reading this, I hope my little rant entertained you.
- This all came to me as soon as read @Guest from North Carolina's post. Just popped int my mind and I felt like writing it.
- Well... that depends on how bad the body looks. Sure, the body is not the only important thing (in fact, its not the first thing I look for in a girl) but there are limits. I'm not going to date a 400 pound lady no matter how nice her personality/face/morals/etc. is.
- I re-read that and it seemed to me like I'm calling you the 400 pound lady. I'm not. Sorry if I made it sound that way.
- Not true. This was a false claim ment to attack the homosexual community. The reality is, AIDS transmissions are very easy to have, regardless of gender. The only reason why homosexual transmittions appear to be higher is because homosexuals tend to switch partners much faster than heterosexual couples.
- Sell it for $$$ profit+4
- Well... at least I'm not a werewolf.+7
- I prefer a colder climate. Also, KU's mascot looks... retarded. I'm sorry but that's how I feel.+1
- It's a Cartoon Network cartoon in the U.S.
- I believe it's called "Adventure Time"
- lol if thats what you think then why are you here?+1
- ask her if you can watch LOL... I have no problem having a gay son though..+2
- I've got passion in my pants and I'm not afraid to show it... show it... I'm sexy and I know it.+4
- yeah so he means 50% disagrees wth Heather.+1
- I'm not gay so....
- Can I still go on vacation/travel
- I prefer skinny girls over fat girls.+2
- Who is to say that 1. is symbolic and 2. isn't? The Bible was written back when the concept of millions of years probably didn't exist, let alone billions. I could very easily say that this part of the Bible is symbolic of the mentioned "God days." As for reviewing the definition of "day," I did. According to Free Online Dictionary, the word day has 8 definitions. 2 of which apply to what I wrote - "A period of time in history." and days being "Period of life or activity." Hence, my use of "God Days" is correct. Investigate all of the variations yourself before you tell people to review it. For the sake of being a hypocrit, I suggest you review the definition of relativity. I suggest the 2 (Philosophy) from the source I mentioned earlier.
- To be fair, a lot of people do the exact same for Ron Paul.+2
- I think the point New Hampshire guest was trying to make was that Obama is not THE WORST president in this country. Others in the past have been far worse. Lyndon B Johnson in my opinion was worse.
- No, he can get away with anything because he's a good politician and a good talker. One of the most important aspects of a politician as far as getting a position of power is to be able to convice others that certain actions will be taken. Such "campaign promises" that end up being lies can be seen in every presidency since campaigning began. Obama's not the only liar. All of them lied about one thing or another. I prefer Ron Paul over Obama for a number of reasons, but I highly doubt that Ron Paul has not lied a single time in his campaign.
- I don't believe the President has the power to make that decision alone.
- Honestly I doubt you know half of what Obama knows about running a country properly.
- Well, the last time I checked, there are 3 branches of government, not just one.
- Racism is an invalid argument because all humans are racist.
- hud
- If you get your head out of your ass, it says that the Bible isn't the only religious text in the world. Also, not everyone believes in God. Dumbasss.+2
- Actually, microbe life has already been found in fossils on Mars via the Rover vehicle. Sure, they're not alive, but it confirms that life was once present on at least one other planet. There can be no doubt that this is true for other galaxies/solar systems.
- Planets that can support life have already been discovered. It is almost gauronteed that life has formed on them. The question is, to what extent has life evolved and whether or not it will ever be sentient.
- nose pierce is way smaller.
- In that case, a skinny girl can have curves too.
- Btw, for those who don't know, pastafarianism is a legitimate parrody religion. It's not just some random thing that people make up every now and then. Both the flying spaghetti monster and the pink unicorn are key parts of it.
- You're dumb... look up what pastafarianism is.+2
- Rude.+2
- Judging by the images, the bird is completely retarded. I see nothing bad about the big cat.
- In my personal opinion, yes. Even if it's cruel and stupid.
- Umm... Budhists don't believe in a God, but they're generally not considered atheists.
- I believe it because I am a Deist.
- Evolution is the result of a prolonged chain of mutations. An organism gets a mutation. If that mutation improves it's ability to survive, the offspring with the mutation will eventually outnumber or even overwhelm those without it. Evolution has occurred.
- Scientific definition of Theory is almost identical to fact.
- Also, because just as there is no proof of B.B. and evolution, there is no proof of God either.
- I'm actually rather surprised at the results. I thought more would vote for A because they could memorize a bunch of past winning lottery numbers and stock trends on the market and then make all the money they would ever need like that, all while being able to relive their life without making childhood mistakes onset by lack of experience. (I accidentally voted B just now and it switched my vote)
- It's just a horse with an extra bone. I don't want a horse.
- Walruses have one of the largest penis sizes in the world. your holes would get permanently destroyed.+3
- I honestly don't see why it's considered wrong or disgusting to have sex with your sister... The only bad thing about incest is that the children are more likely to be deformed. Use condom = absolutely no bad things from incest.+1
- A 9 year old on the other hand, would likely not know what she's getting into, and would be scarred for life (literally, both emotionally and physically).
- By that statement, any planet "can" support life. You can terraform pretty much any planet. Add heat to cold planets. Add shielding from the sun to hot planets. Extract the gas out of a Gas Giant. (And a bunch of other things ofcourse). There's a difference between "can support life" and "can be made to support life."+2
- This would indeed be a good idea to consider. However, it may not be a good idea to add after all things being considered. Although I believe that there should be a downvote button, there are implications. For example, some people who are downvoted may be upset that everybody hates what they wrote. This may influence them to leave the site or perhaps delete their comment (even if it was a good one, but was downvoted by the voters of the other choice).+1
- Frankly, the "human being" is just a clump of cells. Abortions happen naturally, too. So, if abortions are murder, then a large part of the female population are murderers. Do those cells count as a living being? They're alive, but they aren't concious, or self-aware, so they are not a being.
- So... you want the woman to go through the pain of birth, after having to go through the pain of rape.... gj...
- It's not a "human being." It's a clump of cells. There is no brain activity. Also, if you abort the zygote when it has started to grow arms/lets, it has a tail and more closely resembles an amphibian than a human.
- Abortion is not murder. If it is, then nearly all women who will have sex during their lifetime will have a natural abortion.+2
- What's the difference between biologically natural abortions and artificial abortions?+1
- So you're saying "ignorance is bliss"
- Here's my input on the matter: Abortion should be legal. However, it should not be used as a form of birth control to replace condoms or pills. I believe a woman should be allowed 1 abortion per lifetime, not counting abortions of rape-induced pregnancies.
- Abortions happen naturally all the time, whenever a sperm and egg cell meet but are not compatible to the extent that the baby will be deformed mentally or physically. When this happens, the cygote sometimes undergoes a natural abortion... Apoptosis I believe its called. I'll look it up later. Anyway, how is this any different from aborting the baby through a surgical procedure because you already know from tests that it will be born very heavily disabled?+2
- Agreed.+2
- It's not a baby.+1
- lol..... you can't just say adoption and think you've solved rape. Have you considered financial aspects? What if it's a little 13 year old girl that got raped and became pregnant? You want her to die giving birth?+1
- Adoption does not solve rape pregnancies.+1
- How long ago did you submit yours? I also submitted quite a few on this topic
- here was mine - http://www.rrrather.com/view/4770
- Then why do you?+1
- Ahh... having to know that your child is being raised somewhere else, knowing that they probably know little to nothing about you and probably don't like you for giving them away...
- No, they kill fetuses. A fetus is not a baby.+1
- murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. How is the death penalty, a lawful act that is only implemented in extreme cases and needs a lot of conditions to be met before it can be carried out, murder?
- What trents was saying, or at least the way I interpreted it, was that "There are already plenty of children available for adoption. By giving this child up for adoption, if a family adopts this child, this child took the place of another potential child that could have been adopted."
- not at all murder...+1
- It's not a baby.+1
- Smart mothers don't have abortions unless they're completely sure that it's what they need.+1
- A clump of cells meaning it cannot think, cannot interact with its invironment actively, has no brain activity, cannot feel pain, and has no distinct human features yet.
- Until it is born, it has no rights. "Birth-given rights"
- No. It's not a stupid thing to say. It means that men should have no voice in the matter since they can't get pregnant.
- If you consider the sperm and the egg cell meeting, a potential "baby," then you may as well consider every sperm and egg cell a baby too. Each and every egg cell (and most non-deformed sperm cells) can become a potential baby. So, every month a woman isn't pregnant, she is killing 1 or more potential babies. Is that murder? No, it's not. Just because the egg cell has a potential to become a baby doesn't make it one. Same with a zygote/fetus. It's only potentially a baby. It can die from natural causes in the womb, just like an egg cell.+2
- I want to add one final thing: I don't support "abortions." I support the right to make the decition whether or not to abort.+7
- I could ask them about their lives and write stories about them
- I was told that plastic bottles leech chemicals into the drink. Dunno if cans do, but I chose them because they just feel more convenient to me.
- I love ass... so much... if it's fresh from the shower I'd do more than just kiss it.+6
- I prefer completely solid food.+1
- on the right they look like some disgusting vomit color+1
- I can't imagine ever fking a yellow woman with huge eyes that take up more space than the rest of her face+3
- The image looks so beautiful.+1
- GUYS! A snuff film is where people are bruitally slaughtered or murdered for the pleasure of the murderer. It sometimes involves sex, either prior to, after, or during the killing. I'm guessing that a protracted snuff film is "a real snuff film" where a real murderer murders you and records it.+1
- I haven't seen you on in a while
- I'd join the police.+2
- I wish you could go to jail for bullying... there were so many bullies at my schools but the adults hardly gave a damn.
- He did :(
- I've written over 15,000 words in comments. Only asked about 25-30 questions.+2
- You wouldn't notice the gap of time between death and revival.
- I like you. You're one of the few intelligent people on this website.+1
- His comment applies to the "you better vote for god you people" implying that god will punish you if you don't vote for him. Nope, no reason to vote for him out of fear.+2
- There's also more evidence of unicorns existing than God existing.+2
- The multiverse.+2
- You have no source for a counterclaim... hence you are equally invalidated.+3
- Gravity is a theory.+1
- yay 3000th vote!
- But we can't stop war if we have world hunger either :(
- I have a controvercial view on this. Both war and world hunger are necessary for population control. However, I voted World Hunger because people who go to war often choose to go (unless they are drafted.forced). If you're willing to die for your country, I think thats way better than dying of hunger unwillingly.
- I somewhat agree with this.
- Well... if you believe in God creating the Big Bang, you could still vote for the Big Bang and believe in God at the same time.
- Don't even understand how baseball is "the world series" when the world doesn't even recognize baseball as a sport outside the U.S.+7
- I enjoy classical music.+3
- "Global Warming" is incorrectly labled by many as "our planet is heating up everywhere." In actuality, Global Warming is causing warming in some areas and cooling in other areas.+4
- However, I must point out that the Global Climate Change (a much more appropriate way to describe it) is not just caused by human greenhouse gases. It is also caused by a) the sun expanding naturally on its path to becoming a Red Giant, b) Gasses released not by human emittions, but by things like volcanos, animals, etc. c) Polar Ice Caps melting - less ice means less reflection of sunlight back into space, meaning more gets left in the oceans, which in turn melts more ice and this repeats infinitely.+3
- I could manage.
- The crazier the chick, the crazier the sex.+6
- Do you know what a juggalo is?
- I actually mistaked juggalo for gigolo.
- Russia has more numbers, so without nukes in an all-out war, I believe Russia would win. However, there would really be no winner, since both countries would be devastated to the point of complete destruction. They would likely be damaged beyond repair regardless of who wins, if it is an all-out war without nukes.
- Honestly depends on the kind. I hate carrot cake. I hate chicken pot pie+6
- How can you see it after drinking?+2
- I'm a cat person.+2
- Any idea how many people would die?+1
- I don't want to see their nasty old-people parts. Idc if they catch me doing it, I'll just quickly cover myself and tell them to gtfo.
- takes a long time+2
- Thats debatable. The Luftwaffe were one of Germany's strongest forces.
- This is true. This is proven by Thai martial artists who hit their legs against palm trees to creat microfractures.
- Unlike Kristyg, I'm on the opposite end. I drink... a TON of soda. However, I rarely eat junk food or fast food (with the exception of Subway). Last time I was in McDonalds was.... probably last summer. Last time I had a bag of chips was 2 weeks ago.+2
- If the love lasts, yes. If she decides a few months later that I'm too poor and can't provide for her, and leaves me, I'd rather have the money.
- Unless they stabbed you in the lower spinal chord and worked their way up :P
- Reading the Bible would be the same as reading about the Big Bang in a science book.+2
- The Bible was written by man, not God. Man tells us that God created the earth. On a side note, I've considered my beliefs and I've reconsidered them many a times. I have no doubt in my mind that I will reconsider them again some time in the future. However, I remain adamant in my belief that the Bible is nothing more than a tool of propaganda invented by humans in order to control and appease the masses.+1
- I'd have to agree. From what I know of it, the B.B. is not by any means a fact. We have much to learn before we can make such a claim.+1
- Japanese Bigot!+3
- Random chance is very well a possibility.+5
- Same can be said about a number of humans. It's all about raising them right.
- Well... seeing as how I wouldn't be alive to know what happened, I wouldn't be able to like or not like it.+2
- Yes, a human is better than a puppy. However, who are you to say dogs do not have souls? Who are you to decide what others believe? Humans don't have souls either, is what I believe. So there.+1
- Humans are also just animals. Therefore, we either do not have souls or dogs also have souls. Retard.+1
- Sure they are. You're taking an innocent life regardless of what kind it is.+2
- Though I guess that can't be said for insects, but then again, those aren't dogs.
- Cmon man... you're making people who voted for the B.Bang look bad....
- Not necessarily. You could believe that God created the Big Bang. Then, you could vote for the Big Bang, since it would have been what created the world in your opinion.
- usually get paid more and are more well known world-wide.+2
- EA Games has a lot more to offer than the CoD game series, which has what... less than 10 games?+4
- Subway!+2
- Hot coffee
- I feel sad that I can't remember the name of the guy on the left..+1
- You don't always have the choice of having sex or not. Rape is one example, but it is not the only one. You could be mentally impaired and not understand what you are doing, etc.
- No it doesn't.
- Agree.
- 2 things. 1) It is not a baby. It is a zygote. Killing a zygote is the same as killing an egg cell or a sperm cell, since it has no nerve cells to feel pain and no brain cells to understand that it is alive. Hence, it is not yet sentient, making it no different than a skin cell. This is my opinion though, so I'm not saying yours is wrong. However, 2) You're wrong. "They should have thought... before sex." The first thing you're saying with this is that those who didn't think, now have to die. So it's better to let someone who is well aware of life die because of a mistake in life? No. Also, what about those who DID think about it? Condoms are only about 75-80% effective. You can still get pregnant even if you use birth control. What about religion? A catholic man could lie to his girlfriend or wife about using a condom. Rare, but much more common than rape.+1
- At the cost of destroying her own body?+1
- Not necessarily. You can have an abortion when the zygote doesn't even have a single heart cell, let alone a beating heart.+1
- He wouldn't be consciously alive.
- She/He's not saying that his or her belief does matter, he/she's saying that only the woman in question (who is considering an abortion) has the belief that matters. To a certain extent, I agree. The point being, you shouldn't impose your beliefs on others. For example, if you believe gay marriage is a sin, don't get married to a homosexual. You don't have to go yelling at gays that they are a crime against God. If you believe abortion is murder, don't have one. But if someone is going to have one for whatever reason, don't go yelling at them that it's a crime against life. I'm not saying you shouldn't try to talk them out of it, I'm saying you should not force them to have no choices.
- Then I assume you would be in favor of getting rid of the religion of "Christain Scientists" who don't believe in using modern medicine, to the extent where they would rather have their children die than to give them medicine. Am I right in assuming this? If so, [though in my honest opinion I believe this religion should not exist just like Westboro] then the U.S. wouldn't truly have freedom of religion, now would it? So if we're willing to accept such religions that effectively kill their post-birth children, why can't we be willing to let people have abortions?
- The comments are getting too condensed so the below is my reply.
- @random12345 As I mentioned in my first reply, you can have an abortion when the zygote doesn't even have a single heart cell. When it doesn't have arms or legs to kick or ears to listen. A zygote is officially considered a fetus at the 8th month of development, when it begins to develop body parts, but you can have an abortion even before that.
- Please... that's like watching a PETA ad on vegetarianism/veganism. People can easily make equally convincing propaganda the other way too.
- @Random12345 - However, you can get a surgical abortion as early as the 5th week. However, you don't have to have any kinds of surgery to have an abortion. A "morning after pill" is pretty much the same as an abortion, but without the surgery. Also, Early Abortion is abortion performed during the earliest stages of pregnancy, between 5 and 10 weeks from the first day of a woman’s last period. This is the ideal time to seek an abortion because of the extremely small quantity of pregnancy tissue that exists. Most women do not realize that if they are this early in their pregnancy, they do not need a surgical abortion (the method most often offered at traditional abortion clinics). So, to prevent the 'kicking and hearing,' you could limit abortion to the first 5-8 weeks instead of making it entirely illegal.
- A woman who becomes pregnant due to an act of either rape or incest is the victim of a horribly violent and morally reprehensible crime. Although pregnancy as a result of either rape or incest is extremely rare, there is no getting around the fact that pregnancy does occur in some instances.
- Yet, there are still instances where women are so traumatized by the event that this is the last thing on their minds for the first few days/weeks after the trauma
- Sorry for not making it entirely clear what I ment, but I didn't confuse the morning after pill with the Abortion Pill RU486. The Aspiration Procedure and the Abortion Pill were both things I neglected to add into that post. My vague comparison was in that both methods prevent the birth of a baby.
- The morning after pill preventing the birth of the baby by never allowing the sperm and egg to meet, that is.
- normally, it doesn't. However, there are rare situations, and currently, C-sections aren't free. If they were, my opinion would be quite different on this matter.
- You're not considering all of the possibilities (though I might not be either) - First off, I'm not saying that giving birth will kill you. If you scroll thorough my comments, not once did I say "Will kill." l2fedFire said "could" die. Your first reponse to this was "well they should have thought about that before sex." To which I replied that you're forcing the person to die. Death is extremely rare, yes, but it is not completely nonexistent. Some people can't afford a safe c-section procedure even if they have insurance. You also overestimate the intelligence of many individuals on birth control. Some don't even know what a condom does, or how to use it.
- 1% is enough to justify abortions. I'm saying that abortion should not be made illegal 100%. I'm saying it should be limited and regulated, but still available for certain situations that would directly harm the mother or force the pregnancy on her.
- Actually, it would only begin developing human features at the 7-8th week.
- Pro Choice means you're in favor of giving women a choice on the matter. Pro life means you take that choice away regardless of circumstance.
- Fixed. You can be pro choice and be against the excessive use of abortion as an alternative to birth control.
- But think of how many cases there are, where CPS fails to find such a case. They're definately not perfect.
- Depending on the situation, yes you do. It's all about circumstances.+1
- I don't think hitler has any part in this subject.+1
- During development, a human embryo looks more like a fish or lizzard than it does a human being. When it's considered to become "a human being" is subject to opinion and interpretation. Some believe it's only when the baby is born. Others, when it loses its tail and starts looking human. Some think it's when the zygote forms. I believe in the middle.
- Sanity... is for the weak.+3
- Both are insignificant.+7
- Could easily use yahoo.+2
- Yes.
- If I was gay... then I'd have nothing against having relations with men. I'd rather be a gay than an ignorant bigot.+7
- I have brown eyes, but I love blue eyes to death.
- Have at thee! Thy sword shalt not pierce flesh 'ere eve.+3
- The difference is that starving people in the ghetto have already experienced life.+1
- No, they're not free. However, they're not nearly as expencive as a C-section, especially if the insurance of the individual doesn't cover C-sections.
- Smoking is stupid... it's better to smoke pot than tobacco....+4
- No, what he's talking about is the dark ages, where religious crazies condemned science and burned books/destroyed information, etc.+1
- It's better to say "Without religion we would be twice as technologically advanced."+1
- Wrong. There is a direct relationship between solid matter and energy. Energy can be converted into solid matter, and solid matter can be converted into energy.+1
- Anyone who thinks that other's beliefs are retarded is retarded to say the least.
- Anyone who thinks that other's beliefs are retarded is retarded to say the least.
- The idea of going to hell for not believing in God is preposterous. What about all the people who lived before religion was created? What about those isolated African bush-men who don't have any contact with society and don't have gods? Preposterous.+1
- He doesn't believe in hell, hence he won't go to hell.+1
- Believing in something doesn't make it fact. Even if a lot of people believe in it.+2
- Actually, your parents created you.+1
- You sir, have a colorful vocabulary.
- Winning multiple lotteries has greater odds than god existing
- Dear ignorant, religiously conceited, religiously intolerant bigot: We are tired of your overgeneralized, small-minded view of those who don't practice your religion. Please, keep acting the way you do, because compared to your vulgarity, nearly all atheists are better people than you. So, in your own words, "shut your face." - sincerely, the Atheists.+1
- Thanks :) I'd love to rest in peace+2
- I just have to say this: No such thing as proof.+2
- I agree with this message.
- There are no "odds" for evolution. It happened, and it's happening right now. Your argument is like trying to tell someone who won the same lottery 10x in a row that the person's winnings are a fairy tail because the odds are next to zero of that happening.
- Evolution did happen lol... we see it in everyday life.
- Borel's "law" isn't a law at all. It's a complete and utter joke in the scientific world. It should more clearly be labeled as "Borel's hypothesis" because in no way was this tested to be right, ever. Frankly, I can come up with a test right now that disproves it. According to him, if the odds of something happening are 1*10^50 to 1, it will never happen. Wrong. With a random number generater on a computer with 1*10^50 1 numbers, the probability of any single number coming out is lower than that ratio. Yet, a number will still appear with the random number generator, and that number disproves the so-called "law."
- "had it your way" implies I'm the man in the relationship :P
- Paul is old as hell... I'm surprised people don't make heart attack jokes, etc. about him like they did about McCain... but I still like him more than Romney just based on a few specific policies+2
- Hitler was also against smoking... does that make it a good argument for smokers to use against non-smoking laws?
- Perhaps one day, if it should ever happen that CPS gains the power to enforce protective laws in every household, I would change my mind on this part of the argument.
- I'm scared of assassination attempts.
- no incest ftw+3
- We have scorpions :P
- What you have described is evolution. Basic genetic mutations over thousands or millions of generations result in the changing of one species into another.+2
- I wouldn't convert to anything... I would remain agnostic/Deist.
- Gravity is a fact because we can test it for validity at any point in time and get the result immediately. Whereas if we want to test God's existence (by prayer, or other such methods), we would not get an immediate result. Also, many such results could be coincidence, whereas gravity cannot be a coincidence on the planet Earth. I must point out though that Gravity is a scientific theory. We have not fully explored all of the regions of the universe in which such laws may function differently or not exist at all.
- You're missing the sarcastic aspect of my comment.+2
- I didn't say that evolution is the only option. There's also the option of creation followed by evolution. However, there's no option that doesn't have at least some of the aspects of evolution in it.
- But flame wars are so fun! You get to point out the stupidity and ignorance in the comments of those who blatantly attack the other side without any consideration of how vulgar and rude they are :D+6
- A well put answer.+2
- I changed my mind. Pen.
- Let me ask you a simple question: Why should Christianity be the 'correct' religion? What about all of the others? You might see in a few years, that there is a lot you do not yet know. Your opinion may very well change to that of those who voted for the B.Bang theory.+5
- cheaply made doesn't necessarily mean ineffectual :)+1
- Somehow I managed to switch my vote. I dislike this.
- If only it were that simple...
- "Nothing created everything" is a false statement which is not what the Big Bang is. Whoever told you that simply did not know the actual theory.+2
- Look up the God Helmet.+1
- It wasn't for peace. Think back to the crusades. It was for personal benefit.+1
- A law is simply a widely accepted theory. Meaning, all laws are theories. We haven't explored enough of the universe to confirm that gravity always works according to the current laws.
- We are by no means perfect...
- I suppose it depends on you. Whether or not you choose to believe in creationism or evolution dictates the answer. Since neither you nor I will likely go deeply into studying either side of the aspect, our belief will suffice as to how this impacts our life. Now I'll get to the point with the below comment.+1
- I believe in evolution. Actually, that's an understatement. I know in my mind that without a doubt evolution occurred. Whether it was created/invented by God or not can be debated though. Essencially, life was created from simple elements and energy. The elements formed complex molecules. Those molecules then began to coagulate based on need. For example, hydrophobic molecules clustered together in order to avoid as much contact with H2O as possible, forming phospholipid layers in the process. If you have a minute, watch this video. I'll spare you the boring task of having to read some 1000 words. htt p://w ww.youtube.co m/w atch?v=xokbvgdKZww 13:45 - the important part (all of it is interesting imo)+2
- oh and you'll have to get rid of the spaces in the url if you're willing to take a look at it+1
- Yes, yes, it's much more difficult to explain how we have life than to just claim "God did it." When people couldn't understand or explain the phenomenon of rain, thunder, lightning, etc. they said "God did it."+1
- Big Bang theory doesn't say that something was created out of nothing.
- 2nd controvercy: Women armed with guns... the only way this would logically solve the problem is that the women would have to shoot and kill the rapist.
- Controvercy: With less restrictions on guns, it becomes easier for gang members, domestic terrorists, and those with criminal intentions to get them. The more people with guns, the higher the crime rates because given a population, a certain % of that population will have criminal intent.
- 2nd controvercy: Women armed with guns... the only way this would logically solve the problem is that the women would have to threaten and (when threats don't work) shoot/kill the rapist. Now, using your argument that women can simply fake the rape, you're basically giving such women more power in murdering the men they hate. Sure, they can do that now too, but with more accessibility to guns, the rate of such happenings would increase. "Solving" one problem has created numerous others.
- "All I wanted was to say honestly to people: 'Have a look at yourselves and see how bad and dreary your lives are!' The important thing is that people should realize that, for when they do, they will most certainly create another and better life for themselves. I will not live to see it, but I know that it will be quite different, quite unlike our present life. And so long as this different life does not exist, I shall go on saying to people again and again: 'Please, understand that your life is bad and dreary!'"
- College, and all of its expences, assuming you would pay $50,000 tuition per year for an expencive college and $20,000 for room and board, you would only spend $280,000. Add in food and luxury expences (such as going on dates, taking vacations, educational travels), you would spend roughly $500,000 assuming you're living leisurely yet intelligently. Double this for an 8-year degree. With $3 million to $4 million, you could easily afford to buy a car.+2
- Yes, as Random1234 points out, your information here is written in the wrong order. The universe is that which holds all of the millions of galaxies. The Milky Way galaxy has millions of stars, not universes. If you believe in millions of universes, that is a multiverse, not a galaxy.
- I'm not atheist.
- And I'd like to thank you for taking the time to look at the video I posted, as most people usually don't bother to :)
- Ignore the troll please. You're only feeding him.
- The same can be said of people assuming that "No God" automatically means Atheist. There are religions without a god, such as Buddhism.
- That gave me a good laugh.
- Where's your disproof?+2
- Obviously clicking one choice over another dictates an individual's intelligence.
- You trying to ninja my image :(
- Can you please just get it through your head that the Big Bang is NOT "something coming from nothing." The Big Bang theory is everything existing in a hypercondensed form, until it expanded outward during the Big Bang event, and is continuing to expand today. All of the matter in the universe existed prior to the Big Bang in that hyper-condensed form.+1
- how did it what?
- So... you demand that people do what you say, but you refuse to do what other people tell you? If you're not willing to look something up, dont think anyone will listen to you telling them to read something.
- What the hell did you even try to accomplish by this worthless example....+1
- But I'll go ahead and answer. First off, what you wrote is "you believe" instead of "you believe in" meaning you would have to add in an effect clause to your cause clause. If you believe something.... something may or may not happen. You did not include that. Now assuming you ment "I believe in blowing you up, etc." that would make slightly more sense. The answer is you can. Yes. You can believe that. You can't act on it without consequences, but you can believe it. Just like people can believe in sexism or racism, but cannot act on it or they get punished.
- Indeed that is a metaphor
- I'd hate to break it to you, but "scientifically proven" is a paradox. There is no such thing as proving something in the field of science. You can support something, but you cannot prove it.+7
- Beliefs in general are silly.+1
- But... but... "levaticus is just metaphors and stuff!" haha... levaticus is an abomination and most Christians should have abandoned it by now.
- For some reason your diction does not allude to that of a 10 year old.+2
- This.+2
- haha i know that feel :(+1
- Godwin's law. Your argument is made invalid.+3
- 9-11 because it was more recent. If the Holocaust never happened, one of the Jews may have married one of my parents and I would not have been born.
Show us some love
Participate
Search
- Other network sites:
- Best of YouTube
- Never have I ever
- Stock market game
- Pet peeves